Update on the four rls1801 performance regressions reported in CSIT rls1801
report[1]:
1. CSIT-925 Plugin induced NDR/PDR regression
a. All plugins loaded (VPP default) shows throughput variability of 3..5% for
all NIC2NIC tests;
b. Initial regression tests isolated a group of 6 "bad" plugin
Hi Jon,
I missed your in-thread complaint about the PAPI tests somehow and just assumed
that the mail subject is valid. Somehow the history of the thread is not there
- is this a "feature" of the new mailing list?
Anyhow, I've run these tests, both `test` and `test-debug` versions and all
pass
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Burt Silverman wrote:
> I believe the physmem/numa error is just to throw us off -- a code bug but
> an innocuous one at least for non NUMA systems; Damjan would know more.
>
> Jon, I like your idea about it not quitting on the first error. And I
> guess the "Fil
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Can you please provide instructions to reproduce?
>
> I checked out latest master
>
I think we are not communicating.
I checkout any top of tree commit over the past, oh three weeks
or so, an
I believe the physmem/numa error is just to throw us off -- a code bug but
an innocuous one at least for non NUMA systems; Damjan would know more.
Jon, I like your idea about it not quitting on the first error. And I guess
the "File Exists" error is also just something that happens after the
"real
Can you please provide instructions to reproduce?
I checked out latest master
commit 2bc940272ec75d1094326eafb4a3fa2c614e3a7b
Author: Neale Ranns
Date: Sun Feb 25 12:27:18 2018 -0800
Scapy upgrade to 2.4.0.rc5
- many of the patches fd.io applies in test/patches/2.3.3 are now
upstrea
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Klement Sekera wrote:
> This looks kinda like you have old papi installed somewhere.
>
> Please try `make test-wipe` and let me know how it goes.
>
> Thanks,
> Klement
These are clean build of top-of-tree. The 'make test-wipe' has no effect.
I think the proble
Hi,
There is example of CGNAT configuration for currently supported feature set
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/NAT#Example_configuration
Basically you need do following 3 steps:
To enable CGNAT mode of NAT plugin add following to startup config: “nat {
deterministic }”
Set inside and outside inter
Hi,
I have a Ubuntu server machine having 32 cores and four 1 Gigabit NICs with KVM
hypervisor. I want to test VPP performance for CGNAT in NAT444 mode while
supporting routing protocols like BGP and IS-IS on VM topology setup. Kindly
direct me somewhere to get me started. The usage of CGNAT wi
Appreciate you help - Neale
Best Regards,
Avi
> -Original Message-
> From: Neale Ranns (nranns) [mailto:nra...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, 19 March, 2018 11:58 AM
> To: Avi Cohen (A); vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP node that rewrite l2 header
>
>
> Hi Avi,
>
> Dependin
Hi Avi,
Depending on your L3 protocol; ip4-rewirte, ip6-rewrite or mpls-output. Look
for vnet_rewrite_one_header()/vnet_rewrite_two_headers()
Regards,
neale
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Avi Cohen (A)"
Date: Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 13:10
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject:
11 matches
Mail list logo
