On 02/20 21:26:40, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 02/20 14:43:47, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
> > Hi Damjan, Brian,
> >
> > Damjan, your commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/10670 has an impact in
> > vnet_classify that overlaps with what I had written in
> > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/10476/
>
> I see this handles
On 02/20 14:43:47, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
> Hi Damjan, Brian,
>
> Damjan, your commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/10670 has an impact in
> vnet_classify that overlaps with what I had written in
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/10476/
I see this handles u32x4_zero_byte_mask, but I also see breakage
due to u1
It would help if you’d describe the problem that you’re trying to solve.
You can park processes so they wait on specific events, and use events to
sequence processes in arbitrary ways. I can’t think of a case where I’ve wanted
to do that.
Dave
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd
The trick I like, when I don't need quite so much detail as the guide
provides, is to simply remember to look in 2 places for header files,
/usr/include AND /usr/lib/gcc. From /usr/lib/gcc, it is easy to find one's
way down to the include directory for intrinsics. The trick seems to cover
both Ubun
Marco,
The error is due to trying to install a package older than the one already
installed. It appears this issue has been resolved as the centos7 builds are
no longer failing due to this issue.
Thank you,
Vanessa
On Tue Feb 20 07:09:27 2018, mvarl...@suse.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This morning
Hi All,
Is there any way in VPP with which we can control the sequence in which
process nodes are executed. If i want say process node 1 to run after
process node 2, can i define it?
P.S. I am new to VPP, apologies for naive question.
Regards
Nikhil
Hi,
I'm following the steps as per https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2729
To build VPP with MLX5 PMD
The following make command fails :
make dpdk-install-dev DPDK_MLX5_PMD=y
-
cd /home/avi/vpp/dpdk/deb/_build/nasm-2.13.01 && sh configure
I have tried to adjust the num-mbufs to a value higher than 42 and this
resulted in daemon crash about 1.3 minutes after starting it.
This is happening on
-vpp v18.04-rc0~218-g07510dd
-CentOS 7.4 - 4.15.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
[Edited Message Follows]
I managed to get this working with all 8 x 10G interfaces. it seem that the
issue was dpdk_mbuf value which was a bit too low.
I manages to get this working with all 8 x 10G interfaces. it seem that the
issue was dpdk_mbuf value which was a bit too low.
Thanks Ray, and well spotted re regressions..
We were still collecting data on those, as they have been masked before
by another issue related to VPP plugins (jira CSIT-925) that confused
CSIT performance trending machinery, and it was unclear if it was CSIT
environment or VPP code.
We made progr
Hi Damjan, Brian,
Damjan, your commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/10670 has an impact in
vnet_classify that overlaps with what I had written in
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/10476/
However, without some changes in vector_neon.h it has the side effect to
break aarch64 compilation.
I've updated mine above y
I have an unavoidable meeting conflict. Thanks to Damjan for pinch-hitting!
Dave
Hi,
I set the CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MLX5_PMD in
build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/dpdk-17.08/config/common_base
This is probably not the place to set it , because when I rebuild VPP the
CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MLX5_PMD is restored to its default = 'n'
Where do I have to set CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MLX5_PMD for
Hi,
This morning I see another issue affecting the CentOS jenkins job. All others
are fine.
The error marking the build as "Verified-1" can be found below.
10:59:17 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
centos7/dpdk'
10:59:17 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.11-vpp1.x86_64.r
I started disabling dpdk on 3 of the working ports and now i got the ones that
were not working before in working state. So it look like i might reach some
resource limitation when enabling more than 5 interfaces at the same time.
I will need to find out what resource was falling short now. Wis
w00t, much kudos, always hugely valuable.
There are some pretty significant regression on both xl710 and x520 for
vhost and ipsec use cases at the bottom of the table. The most of
significant of these is a 42% drop in the performance of
10ge2p1x520-64b-1t1c-eth-l2xcbase-eth-2vhostvr1024-1vm f
The Intel intrinsics guide are a handy reference for this kind of thing.
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=_mm_testz_si128
You need to trim the additional underscore off the intrinsic to look it up.
Ray K
On 20/02/2018 02:52, Florin Coras wrote:
Okay, I take t
Hopefully this will help:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/10670
compiles fine in my centos7 container.
On 20 Feb 2018, at 03:52, Florin Coras
mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Okay, I take that back. Google tells me these are SSE4 intrinsics, not SSE2 …
Florin
On Feb 19, 2018, at 5:50 PM, E
19 matches
Mail list logo
