Hi all,
My version is 17.04, sometimes there will be a large number of packets
transmitted by vpp.
It looks like that vpp has network loop itself. Here is the stack when the loop
happened. Any idea?
(gdb) c
Continuing.
^C
Thread 1 "vpp_main" received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
eth_em_xmit_pkts
If I understand this correctly, Tina wants these Arm machines to be used as
build/HW validation. I am cc-ing our folks in Huawei, who are going to work in
the community on CSIT to see if they can provide any help, contact person would
be Appana Prasad and Khemendra Kumar.
Thanks,
George
From:
Ed,
Based on Tina saying the ones delivered are OD1000’s, Overdrive machines seem
to come from the factory with Suse on them according to their website.
Chris.
From: csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of Ed Warnicke
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 18
Dear Ed,
What arrived in Canada yesterday were 3x OD1000 for build only.
3 ThunderX are still in process, waiting to be quoted, billed, and shipped,
they are also for VPP build only.
3x http://b2b.gigabyte.com/ARM-Server/R150-T60-rev-110#ov
Thank you,
Tina Tsou
Enterprise Architect
Arm
tina.t.
Gabriel,
We do need to have multiple workers to service the verify queue... having
the queue back up behind a single server wouldn't be good. Do you know if
these boxes are installed with Ubuntu 16.04 already?
Ed
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:03 AM Gabriel Ganne
wrote:
> Yes, they are.
>
> I esti
Hi,
I can see in "vppsb/netlink/librtnl/mapper.h" that each Linux namespace is
mapped to a separate FIB in VPP.
However, the 4.6 Linux kernel has support for VRFs (e.g., using "ip link
add dev NAME type vrf table ID").
If we use the second (VRFs) approach to create multiple FIBs in Linux, can
th
Folks,
The Call for Content for FOSDEM 2018 is closing today!
The "SDN and NFV room" at FOSDEM is great way to get the FD.io message
out there.
Last minute submissions would be most welcome!
To submit see,
https://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2017/11/01/fosdem-2018-sdnnfv-devroom-call-for-content/
Yes, they are.
I estimate it should take about 40 minutes to build and test with 8 cores in
release mode, therefore I do not think that using all 3 ThunderX is necessary.
I do not have access to a ThunderX platform on my side (I ran my tests on NXP
and Hierofalcon platforms), if needed please s
Gabriel,
This is awesome news!
Do I understand correctly that these ThunderX boards are intended to be
used for build/make test/packaging? If so, I've cced in Vanessa, our
fearless sysadmin to help in figuring these things out :)
Do you have opinions about which Linux distributions you want to
Thanks Ole, got it working after running the tests and digging through the test
code. I'm able to capture and parse the IPFIX output from the Flowprobe plugin.
I have another question. I'm going through the examples, specifically the
"Progressive Tutorial - Source NAT" and "VPP/Configure VPP As
Hi,
We've been working on preparing vpp for armv8 continuous testing (See
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/AArch64),
and we think that we now have everything which is required to add arm as ci
platform in the vpp review process (build, test and packaging). All the test
have been done on "native".
Hi,
We want to use VPP for terminating an IPsec tunnel, and forward the inner IP
packets to another (application) process on the same NUMA node.
What are the options for doing that, other than forwarding the packets through
the Kernel ip stack?
The application process itself is built to receive
12 matches
Mail list logo
