Hi Michael and Neale,
As per my previous fixing experience on router plugin, I guess that the cause
may locate at:
Function tap_inject_enabel(): add IPv4 multicast route.
Please take a look at this function and multicast route involved.
-Hongjun
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev
+ csit-dev
Hello Marco,
The mentioned test case is not responsible for -1 in verification as this test
case is marked as non-critical. Please, provide links to affected jobs to find
which TC is really failing.
Thanks,
Jan
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vp
I will look into it. It looks like the calling function is in the file "
turbotap/turbotap/device.c" in vppsb. However, I'm not familiar with the
logic there...
I will try to fix it temporary locally directly in the "
vlib_increment_simple_counter" function and see if it works.
Thanks!
On Fri,
Hi Michael,
It would be best if you fixed the caller to not pass ~0. In this case the ~0 is
coming from the packet VLIB_RX interface. So best to find and fix the input
node that should have set this correctly.
/neale
From: Michael Borokhovich
Date: Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:49
To: "Shaw, J
could you throw me some example jobs?
thanks,
Ed
> On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have seen this many times these days...
> I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken?
>
> The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified...
Hi all,
I have seen this many times these days...
I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken?
The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified... :(
14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after OFFER with wrong
XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on in
Hi Jeff,
Regarding the workaround for the problem [3] (segfault). Do you think it is
enough just to add a simple check e.g., if(index != ~0)? Or we have a
problem somewhere else since the ~0 index should not be passed to this
function?
Thanks,
Michael.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Shaw, Jeff
We've hit a problem using the DPDK HQOS API commands in VPP, where the commands
are actioned, but no response is received by the application. The simplest
repro (using the Python API) is as follows.
ubuntu@ip-10-0-0-100:~/$ python
Python 2.7.12 (default, Nov 19 2016, 06:48:10)
[GCC 5.4.0 201606
Ed,
Thanks for the update and your good advice. I appreciate it.
Justin
- Mail original -
De: "Ed Warnicke"
À: "Justin Iurman"
Cc: "vpp-dev"
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Octobre 2017 23:53:17
Objet: Re: [vpp-dev] Running multiple instances of VPP as it was allowed with
VPP-lite
If you want to ta
Thanks a ton for this investigation,
Please go ahead and submit the patches.
- Pierre
Le 5 oct. 2017 à 19:03, Shaw, Jeffrey B
mailto:jeffrey.b.s...@intel.com>> a écrit :
Hi Michael, do you really need the router plugin? Based on the commands you’re
using it seems you’re adding routes using
10 matches
Mail list logo
