Re: [vpp-dev] Multiple VRFs in 1609

2017-10-04 Thread Michael Borokhovich
Hi Florin, Thank you for the response. The reason I stick to 1609 is the router plugin (vppsb) that works with 1609 but does not with any other VPP version I tried. So, I'm trying to get multiple VRFs works with 1609 since I also need the router plugin for the project... Thanks, Michael. On Wed

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiple VRFs in 1609

2017-10-04 Thread Florin Coras
Michael, I would recommend you switched to a newer release (17.07 or the soon to be release 17.10) since the fib code has been completely reworked in 17.01. Florin > On Oct 4, 2017, at 7:13 PM, Michael Borokhovich wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to configure the following setup. > > Gigabit

[vpp-dev] Multiple VRFs in 1609

2017-10-04 Thread Michael Borokhovich
Hi, I'm trying to configure the following setup. GigabitEthernet0/4/0 - Table 1 GigabitEthernet0/5/0 - Table 2 GigabitEthernet0/6/0 - Table 0 (default) If a packet with DST_IP="10.5.1.0/24" received at GigabitEthernet0/4/0 or GigabitEthernet0/5/0 it needs to be sent via GigabitEthernet0/6/0. Th

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue with tagged packets on DPDK-interface across VMs

2017-10-04 Thread Balaji Kn
Hi All, I tried with both uio_pci_generic driver and igb_uio driver. Please can you share your opinion on this? Regards, Balaji On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Balaji Kn wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on VPP 17.07 and using ubuntu 14.04. I have two VMs say VM1 > and VM2. I am running VPP on

Re: [vpp-dev] Running multiple instances of VPP as it was allowed with VPP-lite

2017-10-04 Thread Florin Coras
Hi Justin, Try api-segment {prefix } Florin > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Justin Iurman wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is it still possible to run multiple instances of VPP, just like it was done > with VPP-lite (see here: > https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial) before merging it ?

[vpp-dev] Running multiple instances of VPP as it was allowed with VPP-lite

2017-10-04 Thread Justin Iurman
Hi all, Is it still possible to run multiple instances of VPP, just like it was done with VPP-lite (see here: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial) before merging it ? Actually, my problem is the following. I need to run several instances of VPP (eg. vpp1, vpp2, vpp3, etc) to s

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Multi-thread

2017-10-04 Thread Alessio Silvestro
Yeah you completely got the point. Thanks for the hint ;) Alessio On Oct 4, 2017 12:11, "Damjan Marion" wrote: > > > On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:14, Alessio Silvestro > wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am running VPP on a CPU with 2 sockets and 4 virtual cores. The startup > configuration is the following

Re: [vpp-dev] [vpp-v17.10] L2 forwarding errors in vhost-user configuration

2017-10-04 Thread John Lo (loj)
The "proper" CLI is "show node counters" which displays stats kept by various graph nodes including normal operation counts and possibly error counts. The CLI "sho err" is historical and was kept for backward compatibilities. The old CLI is somewhat misleading but is quicker to type then the pro

[vpp-dev] Packet data and vlib_buffer contiguity

2017-10-04 Thread Francois Ozog
Hi, Hardware that is capable of 50Gbps and above (at 64 byte line rate) place packets next to each other in large memory zones rather than in individual memory buffers. To handle packets without copy would require vlib_buffer_t to allow packet data to be NOT consecutive to it. Are there plans or

[vpp-dev] Fixes not being cherry picked to stable/1710

2017-10-04 Thread Florin Coras
Folks, I see a number of patches on master that look like fixes, have the word “fix” in subject line, but no jira ticket assigned and have not been cherry-picked to stable/1710. Could patch owners, once their patches have been merged, take care of these last two steps *if needed* and thereby a

Re: [vpp-dev] [vpp-v17.10] L2 forwarding errors in vhost-user configuration

2017-10-04 Thread Saxena, Nitin
Thanks for the clarification Damjan -Nitin From: Damjan Marion Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 3:37 PM To: Saxena, Nitin Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Steven Luong (sluong); Athreya, Narayana Prasad Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [vpp-v17.10] L2 forwarding errors in vhost-u

Re: [vpp-dev] [releng] Proposal to redirect #opendaylight-releng to #lf-releng

2017-10-04 Thread Ed Warnicke
One suggestion I would have would be to do a phased transition, with a 'topic' in the existing infra channels set to direct folks to lf-releng, and a period (3 months?, 6 months?) of keeping a presence on the existing channels, to be used to politely request bouncing conversations that arise in t

Re: [vpp-dev] [releng] Proposal to redirect #opendaylight-releng to #lf-releng

2017-10-04 Thread Thomas F Herbert
+ci-...@fd.io This probably should also go to ci-man which is roubhly the equivalent of releng in opnfv. --TFH On 10/03/2017 02:12 PM, Thanh Ha wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Thanh Ha mailto:thanh...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Hi Everyone, We'd like to pitch an idea to

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Multi-thread

2017-10-04 Thread Damjan Marion
> On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:14, Alessio Silvestro wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am running VPP on a CPU with 2 sockets and 4 virtual cores. The startup > configuration is the following: > > unix { > interactive > nodaemon > } > > cpu { > main-core 0 > corelist-workers 2-3 >

Re: [vpp-dev] [vpp-v17.10] L2 forwarding errors in vhost-user configuration

2017-10-04 Thread Damjan Marion
> On 3 Oct 2017, at 17:32, Saxena, Nitin wrote: > > Hi, > > While running ping between VM1 to VM2 on aarch64, configured using vhost-user > interface, I am seeing following L2 errors in VPP v1710 for each ICMP packet > sent > > > DBGvpp# show err >

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp_configure_args_vpp = --disable-japi compilation issue

2017-10-04 Thread Avinash Dhar Dubey
Thanks Damjan. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: > > > > On 3 Oct 2017, at 11:47, Avinash Dhar Dubey > wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to compile vpp with flag vpp_configure_args_vpp = > --disable-japi by modifying the file datapath/vpp/build-data/platforms/ > vp