Hey all,
When I start vpp using latest code and enter "show features" in CLI in my
server, I got below output,
which is different from the log output by doing "make test".
Is there something I missed?
vpp# sh feat
Available feature paths
nsh-output:
mpls-output:
mpls-input:
ip6-output:
ip6-multi
Hi,
could we bump vpp version in stable/1704 branch
to 17.04.2 in order to match next release version?
Here is patch:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7031/
The reason is to have correct version of jvpp artifacts in nexus (more details
below).
Regards,
Marek
-Original Message-
From: Marek G
Alessio,
> when you say
>
> "You need to also start VPP with:
> punt { socket }"
>
> do you mean to insert the above line in the /etc/vpp/startup.conf ?
yes, you can do that.
or you can start VPP in the root build directory with: make run
and set the environment variable STARTUP_CONF to point
Dear Ole,
when you say
"You need to also start VPP with:
punt { socket }"
do you mean to insert the above line in the /etc/vpp/startup.conf ?
What about the socket. Should I bind it to the NIC I am using for vpp or it
is a generic socket?
Thanks for the help. In case I will let it work I gue
Hello,
We observed vpp unit test failures during verification of patch
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7015/ where the csit operational branch has been
updated - it has no impact to vpp unit test execution. Failures have occurred
on containerised PoC builds as well as on official fd.io JJB builds:
The example you cite is not terribly convincing. The only alternative to a
large number of ip route add/del parameters would be a large number of discrete
APIs with considerable parameter overlap.
API messages need handlers, pretty-print functions, and test code; all of which
require maintenan
Hi Alessio,
If you want to extend what I did (with the punt socket.
You need to also start VPP with:
punt { socket }
Then you should see the print messages you added in on the VPP console / cli.
Best regards,
Ole
> On 5 Jun 2017, at 19:49, Alessio Silvestro wrote:
>
> Dear Ole,
>
> In order
Hi everyone
From my experience from using vpp apis in honeycomb,i would like to see
approach that api does not use giant ammount of parameters(ip_add_del_route for
ex.), specialy if that api call defines more than one logical entity,of if
there is too many combinations of use of that api. It al