Hi neale,
The result :flow is ok. But when have bi-directional flow ,the assertion will
appear:
That is the assertion:
DBGvpp# 0: /home/vpp/build-data/../src/vnet/ip/ip4_forward.c:2635
(ip4_rewrite_inline) assertion `ip0->checksum == ip4_header_checksum (ip0)'
fails
Aborted
/home/vpp/build-da
Hi Guy,
thanks for the hints.
It works now :)
Best regards,
Alessio
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Burt Silverman wrote:
> ./configure rather than .configure
>
> Thank you for pointing out the -s option. I may start using that. I only
> use -f when it is required (in general).
>
> Guy, did
I had the same problem last week,
Try the following:
autoreconf -fis
.configure
make
Guy
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of Alessio Silvestro
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 7:53 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP/How To Build The Sample
Hi all,
I am trying to build the sample vpp-engine plug-in as explained here (
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Build_The_Sample_Plugin).
I already tested my vpp installation, for instance it works when I created
a Source NAT.
I downloaded the most updated version of the sample-plugin and run
Hi Xyxue,
As you say, probably also:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6883/
thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 12:16
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS
Hi neale,
My configuration and result is shown below:
VPWS:
##
Hi Xyxue,
I found a bug where the lookup DPO for MPLS is not popping the label. The
buffer pointer is thus 4 bytes off, and so the IPv4 lookup is done on the
source not destination address.
Please patch both VPPs with:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6883/
thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26
Hi neale,
My configuration and result is shown below:
VPWS:
PE1
create host-interface name eth0
create host-interface name eth1
set int state host-eth1 up
set int state host-eth0 up
set interface mac address host-eth0 00:03:7F:FF:FF:FF
set interface mac add
Thanks John.
From: John Lo (loj) [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 8:33 PM
To: Dharmaray Kundargi ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] : VPP build does not generate
DPDK is moved to the plugin package vpp-plugins_17.04-release_amd64.deb since
17.04 or later. -John
F
Sorry, I meant "ip6_neighbor_sw_interface_add_del"
Thanks,
-nagp
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <
nagp.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When radv_info is created, it is initialized to zero, but mcast_adj_index
> is assigned in the same flow - in ip6_sw_interface_add_del - so I
When radv_info is created, it is initialized to zero, but mcast_adj_index
is assigned in the same flow - in ip6_sw_interface_add_del - so I guess
that should be fine..
-nagp
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Neale Ranns (nranns)
wrote:
>
>
> Yes please J assuming of course mcast_adj_index defaul
Yes please ☺ assuming of course mcast_adj_index defaults to ~0 when the
radv_info is first created.
/neale
From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 10:12
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Is adj_index "0" not valid?
Then it means that the followi
Hi Xyxue,
Yes, I think that looks good.
To do VPLS add the mpls-tunnel and [many] host-eth to a bridge-domain, rather
than a x-connect.
Regards,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 09:00
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS
Hi neale,
Is my confi
Hi neale,
Each of the two VPP is connected to a CE. I'm pinging to and from the CE.
Thanks,
xyxue
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Date: 2017-05-26 17:07
To: 薛欣颖; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi Xyxue,
So the addresses you are pinging to and from are not owned by the
Then it means that the following code snippet in icmp6_router_solicitation:
--
adj_index0 = radv_info->mcast_adj_index;
if (adj_index0 == 0)
error0 = ICMP6_ERROR_DST_LOOKUP_MISS;
--
should be changed like this?:
--
adj_index0 = radv_info-
Hi nagp,
In the latest VPP code adjacency index 0 is valid. In older code this was not
the case.
Regards,
neale
From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 08:43
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Is adj_index "0" not valid?
Hi,
In the latest VPP code, in icmp6_route
Hi Xyxue,
So the addresses you are pinging to and from are not owned by the VPPs. Are you
issuing the ping command on a VPP or on the device that owns the address.?
/neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 08:43
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN
Hi there,
> Many applications have two channels, one is data channel, the other is
> control channel, both have different ports,
> so we need ALG to help these protocols to cut through FW, i think it is a
> pretty important feature and
> it has been surpported by almost every manufacturer on th
Hi neale,
Is my configuration below correct?
MPLS L2VPN（VPWS）
PE1
create host-interface name eth0
create host-interface name eth1
set int state host-eth1 up
set int state host-eth0 up
set int ip address host-eth0 1.1.1.1/24
set interface mac address
Hi,
In the latest VPP code, in icmp6_router_solicitation - the code checks for
radv->mcast_adj_index and if it is "0" - it flags an error
ICMP6_DST_LOOKUP_MISS.
However, in ip6_neighbor_sw_interface_add_del - when the radv_info_t
structure is getting initialized - when mcast_adj_index is allocate
Hi neale,
Is this correct in trace:
00:18:57:702675: lookup-ip4-dst
fib-index:1 addr:192.168.2.20 load-balance:31
192.168.2.20 is src ip not the dst ip.
It seems that lack of pop a label .
That is the infomation about it:
VPP1: show mplsfib
DBGvpp# sh ip fib index 1 192.168.2.20
ipv4-V
Hi Xyxue,
If these are the addresses you are pinging to and from:
VPP2 ->vpp1 sip： 192.168.2.20 -- dip：192.168.3.20
Then let’s see how they are reachable on each device;
sh ip fib index 1 192.168.2.20
sh ip fib index 1 192.168.3.20
on both VPP instances.
And also:
sh int addr
on both. S
21 matches
Mail list logo
