Re: [vpp-dev] Is the TCP implementation multi-instance capable?

2017-05-24 Thread Florin Coras
Hi Nagp, No, the current implementation is not multi-fib capable, i.e., all connections go through the main fib. Transport endpoint structs used in the session api and the application interface already carry vrfs but we’re not yet using them in tcp and for session lookup. We do however plan to

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

2017-05-24 Thread 薛欣颖
Hi Neale, I forgot to say ,I neither created tunnel nor used LDP.I used the static command configuration. Thanks, xyxue From: 薛欣颖 Date: 2017-05-25 13:36 To: nranns; vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi Neale, The ping still failed .Here is the specific information: DBGvp

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

2017-05-24 Thread 薛欣颖
Hi Neale, The ping still failed .Here is the specific information: DBGvpp# show trace CLIB unknown format `%#' x label 0 eos 1024 17:23:38:439098: lookup-mpls-dst fib-index:0 hdr:[1023:85:0:eos] load-balance:29 17:23:38:439159: ip4-mpls-label-disposition disp:0 17:23:38:439198:

[vpp-dev] Is the TCP implementation multi-instance capable?

2017-05-24 Thread Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
I am asking this because the session lookup functions in tcp_input.c does not seem to be taking a fib index or a table id to look up the session - just the usual 4-tuple. If it is done in a different way, please help me see it. Thanks, -nagp ___ vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-verify-master-centos7 failure

2017-05-24 Thread Burt Silverman
I am guessing the fix will work long term, but if not, perhaps an alternative is to add --oldpackage to the rpm install options. Burt On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: > > > On 05/18/2017 04:37 PM, Florin Coras wrote: > > Well, uri.am is a known issue, apparently not the

Re: [vpp-dev] Some error in L3VPN

2017-05-24 Thread Luke, Chris
That specific trace formatting error was fixed on master earlier today. Could you give it a try? Chris. From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of ??? Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 22:03 To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] Some error in L3VPN Hi

[vpp-dev] Some error in L3VPN

2017-05-24 Thread 薛欣颖
Hi guys, There is a ping failed occured in L3vpn,and the trace had incorrect print information below: DBGvpp# show trace CLIB unknown format `%#' x label 0 eos 1024 17:23:38:439098: lookup-mpls-dst fib-index:0 hdr:[1023:85:0:eos] load-balance:29 17:23:38:439159: ip4-mpls-label-dis

Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec interface handling in FIB

2017-05-24 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi Matt, Glad to hear it. And thank you for the patch. Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Matthew Smith Date: Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 22:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec interface handling in FIB Hi Neale,

Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec interface handling in FIB

2017-05-24 Thread Matthew Smith
Hi Neale, I set that flag and have been testing with it and it seems to have solved the problem. Thanks! -Matt > On May 20, 2017, at 2:18 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > No ARP lookup is needed for interfaces that are point-2-point. The FIB will > link entries reachable

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP interface configuration problem

2017-05-24 Thread Alessio Silvestro
Dear Neale, your guess was right. With ping it works fine and vpp does not crash. I was using prove because is suggested by the official wiki in order to test the interface, therefore I would suggest to replace it also in the wiki. Thanks for the prompt answer. Best regards, Alessio On Wed, M

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP interface configuration problem

2017-05-24 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi Alessio, My guess is the probe command caused VPP to crash, and since your running it as a deamon, it restarted with your previous configs gone. The probe command sends an ARP request to the address in question, so don’t probe your own address, instead probe a peer’s. These days we also hav

[vpp-dev] VPP interface configuration problem

2017-05-24 Thread Alessio Silvestro
Dear all, I use the vagrant installation. I can start the VM, build the packages and start vpp process. I am stuck at the step (Step 1: Configure and enable an interface) of the guide available at https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Build,_install,_and_test_images. At the first boot I have: vagrant@lo

Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS

2017-05-24 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi Xyxue, VPP does not support VP{WL]S. However, I’ve made a patch to enable it; https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6861/1 please experiment and let me know how you get on. Changes to your configs below: - Create the mpls tunnel in L2 mode mpls tunnel l2-only via 1.1.1.2 host-eth0 out-label

Re: [vpp-dev] The Case Of the Missing API Definition

2017-05-24 Thread Lori Jakab
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:00 AM, wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > Hi Ole, > > > Thanks for the poetry! ;-) > > Most welcome. > > > This is me in 01384fe > > Apologies for that. Next time I see you let me bring both band aid and > whiskey. > > Apology

Re: [vpp-dev] shadow build system change adding test-debug job

2017-05-24 Thread Ed Kern (ejk)
well sure enough…i doubled the cpu reservation and it all passed clean… things are pretty quiet right now so ill throw it up again when things are busy but right now I’m just happy to see a full test-all-debug pass. thanks, Ed > On May 24, 2017, at 8:42 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEO

Re: [vpp-dev] Running VPP in a non-default network namespace

2017-05-24 Thread Luke, Chris
It may be extreme, but perhaps detect if any namespace is configured (whether we’re running in a namespace or in the default) and then fall back to the safest behavior (with a note in the startup output saying so). Is it reasonable? Could add a flag that always binds every device found for peop

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP has no interfaces after update from 1704 to 1707 master

2017-05-24 Thread Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi, Seems that your last patch fixed the issue. I was now able to bind both unbound interfaces and also interfaces that were bound to kernel but were down. Thanks _____ _ ___ __/ __/ _ \ (_)__| | / / _ \/ _ \ _/ _// // / / / _ \ | |/ / ___/ ___/ /_/ /(_)_/

Re: [vpp-dev] The Case Of the Missing API Definition

2017-05-24 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:00 AM, wrote: > Hi Jon, Hi Ole, > Thanks for the poetry! ;-) Most welcome. > This is me in 01384fe > Apologies for that. Next time I see you let me bring both band aid and > whiskey. Apology accepted! > To my excuse, there has been this list of "broken" APIs maint

Re: [vpp-dev] DPDK Crypto Plugin: rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst does not return Decrypted packets

2017-05-24 Thread Avinash Gonsalves
Hi Sergio, Right, without the change to dpdk.am, it builds correctly with the crypto libraries, but the plugin fails to load. After the change, i'm able to load the plugin, but the enqueue_crypto call does not return, no crypto error ops counters are incremented either Building it using the "mak

Re: [vpp-dev] shadow build system change adding test-debug job

2017-05-24 Thread Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
I know that the functional BFD tests passed so unless there is a bug in the tests, the failures are pretty much timing issues. From my experience the load is the culprit as the BFD tests test interactive sessions, which need to be kept alive. The timings currently are set at 300ms and for most test

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP has no interfaces after update from 1704 to 1707 master

2017-05-24 Thread Damjan Marion (damarion)
I think i fixed the issue. New version is in gerrit. If you still see the crash please try to capture backtrace. Thanks, Damajn > On 24 May 2017, at 16:29, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: > > > Any chance you can capture backtrace? > > just "gdb —args vpp unix interactive” > > Thanks, >

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP has no interfaces after update from 1704 to 1707 master

2017-05-24 Thread Damjan Marion (damarion)
Any chance you can capture backtrace? just "gdb —args vpp unix interactive” Thanks, Damjan > On 24 May 2017, at 13:10, Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES > at Cisco) wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried your patch, I built rpms from it and then reinstalled vpp with those > rpms. I

Re: [vpp-dev] shadow build system change adding test-debug job

2017-05-24 Thread Ed Kern (ejk)
right now its a VERY intentional mix…but depending on loading I could easily see this coming up if those timings are strict. To not dodge your question max loading on my slowest node would be 3 concurrent builds on an Xeon™ E3-1240 v3 (4 cores @ 3.4Ghz) yeah yeah stop laughing…..Do you have s

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP has no interfaces after update from 1704 to 1707 master

2017-05-24 Thread Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi, I tried your patch, I built rpms from it and then reinstalled vpp with those rpms. I ensured that the interface was not bound to kernel or dpdk. But I got Segmentation fault. See output: [root@overcloud-novacompute-1 ~]# dpdk-devbind --status Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver ==

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

2017-05-24 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi Xyxue, The lookup was performed in FIB index 1– you must have used ‘set int ip table host-XXX YYY’ - but the route you added is in the default table. If you want the routes in the same table as the interface do; Ip route add table YYY 192.168.3.0/24 via mpls-tunnel0 out-label 1023 Regards,

Re: [vpp-dev] Running VPP in a non-default network namespace

2017-05-24 Thread Damjan Marion
Yeah, I’m aware of this issue but I don’t have any good idea how to address it. We can disable unbind if we detect that we are running inside namespace, but that will not fix problem in opposite direction, when specific interface is mapped to namespace and vpp running in global. any ideas? >

[vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

2017-05-24 Thread 薛欣颖
Hi guys, I have the following configuration: mpls tunnel add via 2.1.1.1 host-eth1 out-label 1024 set int state mpls-tunnel0 up ip route add 192.168.3.0/24 via mpls-tunnel0 out-label 1023 Ping from CE to PE ,and the PE drop it. That is the fib : 192.168.3.0/24 unicast-ip4-chain [@0]: dpo-

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP has no interfaces after update from 1704 to 1707 master

2017-05-24 Thread Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Yes, I can try that. Will send you more details after it is done. Michal -Original Message- From: Damjan Marion (damarion) Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 6:39 PM To: Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Cc: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; Marco Varlese ; Kinsella, Ray ;

Re: [vpp-dev] The Case Of the Missing API Definition

2017-05-24 Thread otroan
Hi Jon, Thanks for the poetry! ;-) This is me in 01384fe Apologies for that. Next time I see you let me bring both band aid and whiskey. To my excuse, there has been this list of "broken" APIs maintained by the Python and Java language binding implementors. It's been on the todo list for a lon