Hi, all
Below are my main configs, others are default.
When i knock into this cmd "vppctl ip route 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.10.40.1" to add
one default route,
the vpp crashed, it looks like this func fib_entry_get_resolving_interface call
itself recursivly till vpp's crash.
Is there something wrong?
c
Hi,
I mean that these two interfaces both are l3 mode in vpp, with default config
mode,
there are two relevant interfaces which are bound to dpdk in vm are bridged to
the same phy interface.
I used VM Workstation here.
Am i clear?
Regards,
Ewan
yug...@telincn.com
From: Neale Ranns (nrann
Hi Mina,
The packet is forwarded in IP4 forwarding path so the ACL should definitely be
placed with the ip4-table option and not l2-table option.
According to the packet trace, ip4-inacl node is invoked on packet received on
sw_if_index 9 and used classify table index 1 to process it. You can l
Dear Guy,
The clib_socket(...) APIs use system calls to send/receive data via the Linux
network stack. Linux is blissfully unaware of vpp interfaces, so it can't work.
To receive ip-udp-for-us-to-a-dst-port packets on a vpp interface, register a
graph node to process packets. See.../src/vnet/vx
Hi,
I am trying to use the clib_socket interface to process a udp multical stream
being received by fd.io interface.
I followed the example in test_socket.c. I am registering for the stream as
follows:
s->config = "232.0.0.1:5001";
..
error = clib_socket_init (s);
..
error = clib_socket_rx (s,
Hi all,
I have defined a classify table with no session and its acl-miss-next is
drop and assigned it to all interfaces including subinterface. I also
defined another classify table with a session that permit packets with
specific src and dst address according to my intended subinterface. I also
a
tEthernet0/7/0
>> Ethernet address fa:16:3e:f2:15:a5
>> Intel 82599 VF
>> carrier up full duplex speed 1 mtu 9216
>> rx queues 1, rx desc 1024, tx queues 1, tx desc 1024
>>
>> I've tried a similar setup between two virtual box VM's an
t;* configured for the 10G NIC.*
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >>* So VPP is installed in a VM, and all interfaces work OK, then can be*
>>>
>>> >>* reached from outside the VM etc. Following the basic examples on the
>>> >>wiki,
Ed,
I'm working on building the base image and getting puppet agent installed.
Thanks,
Vanessa
On 05/12/2017 07:12 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Vanessa,
>
> What is the status on this? Also, please get Marco access to the
> ticketing system.
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Marco Varlese
>
>> >>* vpp# set int state TenGigabitEthernet0/7/0 up*
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>* But when trying to ping for example the physical NIC on the other
>> >>server,*
>>
>> >>* we get no reply:*
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>* vpp# ip probe 10.0.1.1 TenGigabitEthernet0/6/
See my another post sent few mins ago to this list…
On 12 May 2017, at 11:10, Tomas Brännström
mailto:tomas.a.brannst...@tieto.com>> wrote:
Thanks. I can try to use a later VPP version. A thing to note is that when we
did try to use the master release before, VPP failed to discover interfaces,
t; tx good packets 3
>> tx good bytes 126
>> TenGigabitEthernet0/7/02 up TenGigabitEthernet0/7/0
>> Ethernet address fa:16:3e:f2:15:a5
>> Intel 82599 VF
>>
On 05/12/2017 01:54 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:
> If you cannot add me to the system, I am more than happy to have any
> updates via email.
You can log into the ticket system by going to
https://rt.linuxfoundation.org if it's your first time trying to get in
select the 'Forgot your password?' link a
thernet0/7/02 up TenGigabitEthernet0/7/0
>> Ethernet address fa:16:3e:f2:15:a5
>> Intel 82599 VF
>> carrier up full duplex speed 1 mtu 9216
>> rx queues 1, rx desc 1024, tx queues 1, tx desc 1024
>>
>> I've tried a s
Hi, just a thought, right now we have not enabled DPDK in hte VM (we
installed the DPDK version of VPP but has not installed DPDK to handle the
NIC), we thought that we should take it in steps and first gett VPP working
and then add DPDK functionality. Do you think DPDK is needed in order to
get it
Hi Ewan,
You mentioned that these interfaces are ‘bridged to the same host phy
interface’ – can you please share the relevant configs for that.
Thanks,
neale
From: "yug...@telincn.com"
Date: Friday, 12 May 2017 at 13:51
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] arp_input
root@ubuntu:/# vppctl show int addr
GigabitEthernet2/9/0 (up):
10.10.55.52/16
GigabitEthernet2/a/0 (up):
192.168.20.1/24
root@ubuntu:/# vppctl show ip arp|grep 10.10.55.50
70.0606 10.10.55.50 DN f4:4d:30:16:ea:c1 GigabitEthernet2/9/0
70.4546 10.10.55.50 DN f4:4d:30:16:ea:c1
Hi Ewan,
Please post your configs and the output of ‘sh ip arp’.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com"
Date: Friday, 12 May 2017 at 12:33
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] arp_input
Here are two arp_input functions on vpp 16.09 and vpp 17.04, if my VM have
two ethernet in
Vanessa,
What is the status on this? Also, please get Marco access to the ticketing
system.
Ed
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Marco Varlese
wrote:
> Hi Vanessa,
>
> Did you get any chance to look into this?
> I tried to login onto the ticketing system but I still get the
> unauthorized erro
Here are two arp_input functions on vpp 16.09 and vpp 17.04, if my VM have
two ethernet intefaces with different network segment,
and both of them are bridged to the same host phy interface, then we will have
same arp entry on each interface. Why we process like this on version 17.04.
ver
Thanks, I have found the commit which fixes the busy loop issue. Now CPU
utilization is at bay. Thanks a lot! :-)
-nagp
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <
nagp.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Damjan, can you please point me to the commit so that I can
> pick them?
>>* hardware":*
>
> >>
>
> >>* vpp# show hardware*
>
> >>* NameIdx Link Hardware*
>
> >>* TenGigabitEthernet0/6/01 up TenGigabitEthernet0/6/0*
>
> >>* Ethernet address fa:16:3e:04:42:d1*
>
> >>* Intel 82599 VF*
>
> >>* carrier up full duplex speed 1 mtu 9216*
>
> >>* rx queues 1, rx desc 1024, tx queues 1, tx desc 1024*
>
> >>
>
> >>* tx frames ok 3*
>
> >>* tx bytes ok 126*
>
> >>* extended stats:*
>
> >>* tx good packets 3*
>
> >>* tx good bytes 126*
>
> >>* TenGigabitEthernet0/7/02 up TenGigabitEthernet0/7/0*
>
> >>* Ethernet address fa:16:3e:f2:15:a5*
>
> >>* Intel 82599 VF*
>
> >>* carrier up full duplex speed 1 mtu 9216*
>
> >>* rx queues 1, rx desc 1024, tx queues 1, tx desc 1024*
>
> >>
>
> >>* I've tried a similar setup between two virtual box VM's and that worked*
>
> >>* OK, so I'm thinking it might have something to do with SR-IOV for some*
>
> >>* reason. I'm having a hard time troubleshooting this since I'm not sure
> >>how*
>
> >>* to check where the packets actually get lost...*
>
> >>
>
> >>* /Tomas*
>
> >>
>
> >>* ___*
>
> >>* vpp-dev mailing list*
>
> >>* vpp-dev at lists.fd.io <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev>*
>
> >>* https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> >><https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev>*
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >* *
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> -- next part --
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> URL:
> <http://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/attachments/20170512/5a0abc73/attachment.html>
>
>
>
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Thanks. I can try to use a later VPP version. A thing to note is that when
we did try to use the master release before, VPP failed to discover
interfaces, even when they were whitelisted. Not sure if something has
changed in the way VPP discover interfaces in later versions. I will try
with 1704 th
Hi Vanessa,
Did you get any chance to look into this?
I tried to login onto the ticketing system but I still get the unauthorized
error.
If you cannot add me to the system, I am more than happy to have any updates via
email.
Thanks,
Marco
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 04:21 -0700, Ed Warnicke wrote:
On 12 May 2017, at 08:01, Tomas Brännström
mailto:tomas.a.brannst...@tieto.com>> wrote:
(I forgot to mention before, this is running with VPP installed from binaries
with release .stable.1701)
I strongly suggest that you use 17.04 release at least.
With PF do you mean packet filter? I don't
25 matches
Mail list logo
