Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we consider the free chat GPT3.5 AGI?

GPT4 can have unlimited memory, right? Just give it access to a query engine. Max token context length (input PLUS output) is 32k in the latest model. GPT3.5 is 4096. https://openai.com/pricing Importantly, GPT4 has built 'world models' as a side effect of its training. And when it predicts t

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

Two questions that are currently speculative and open that don't get much press (because they are speculative, I guess, and likely will cause undue alarm) - Is sars2 bi-phasic ('like anthrax') https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/02/27/national/diamond-princess-coronavirus-2/ If it is bi-phasic,

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

been treated. And now some whistle blower apparently is saying people didn't take precautions - https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/27/politics/hhs-whistleblower-coronavirus/index.html On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:37 PM Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Two questions that are currently speculative and open t

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

Yeah, that is so hilariously stupid. It's like the white house has become a Conspiracy Theory factory. "So, everyone, rather than scientists and experts speak about what they rationally know to be true, only totality unqualified and completely biased politicians are allowed to talk." Lol. this

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

n Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:20 AM Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Yeah, that is so hilariously stupid. It's like the white house has > become a Conspiracy Theory factory. "So, everyone, rather than scientists > and experts speak about what they rationally know to be true, on

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

^^ bill gates Apologies for spam. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:27 AM Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2003762 > > Right off the top. He's not pussyfooting, that's for sure: > > n any crisis, leaders have two equally important resp

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

I don't think we yet know where the virus came from. Until that detail is nailed down, I think the jury is still out. https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/where-did-new-coronavirus-come-past-outbreaks-provide-hints-n1144521 On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:04 PM Jones Beene wrote: > This is

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

Communism/Fascism is great for quarantining. Not sure it's that great for sharing critical information broadly, coming up with vaccines, medical tests and and treatments. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 6:52 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: > That was a superb presentation by Bruce Aylward. Jones: thanks for

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

arrive. Stuff like this breeds very very nasty conspiracy theories. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 8:46 PM Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Communism/Fascism is great for quarantining. Not sure it's that great > for sharing critical information broadly, coming up with vaccines, medical >

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

-589.html On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 3:42 PM Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/01/health/coronvirus-patient-research-cdc/index.html > > > Though, if our capitalist system works like this maybe we would be better > off with communism. At the very least the

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

Good news, finally! pretty low mortality rate in South Korea. Perhaps very aggressive testing is just the thing we need. Lots of drive through testing throughout the country would be great. Catch it early, make people aware of their status. Get them to self isolate. It's pretty noninvasive

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

China had a lot of very very useful information that they could have shared early with other Nations so they could get better prepared - but didn't. In the US any can just click over and read the mmwr's from CDC or other western nations. Centralized governments by their very nature keep a very t

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:43 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > If you haven't had your fill here, there's lots of info on reddit > > https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/ > > > Stay away for your own mental health and sanity. It's just 24/7 news postings largely overwhelmed by anything that happens to i

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

Folks, please, there is no need to post anonymous random anecdotal reports. It does nothing but spread unnecessary panic and is tantamount to shouting fire in a crowded theater. Everyone is aware of the risks of lack of surge capacity. Here is something a bit more informed and not so anecdotal

[Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

This is based on - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. Could be updating this prob

Re: [Vo]:A physicist still unfinformed on huffingtonpost

Am I the only one that can't help but chuckle at this: "Norway recently has successfully installed a reactor using a mixture of thorium and plutonium," On Mon, Jan

Re: [Vo]:A physicist still unfinformed on huffingtonpost

down. But I understand > your cynicism toward such irrational exuberance. > > Regards, > John > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Am I the only one that can't help but chuckle at this: "Norway recently >> has successf

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

ere icky++ Porn and Gambling are pretty much equivalent, moral wise. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:53 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Does that imply LENR is a gamble? > > > On Monday, January 6, 2014, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > >> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo Cor

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

g and Gambling Tech Market<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name> " -4% Now back to 31%. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > This is based on &

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

here as well. The Chinese thing is interesting and it was my biggest source of excitement. But then I just read that Rossi has staffed his biz with ex-gambling industry people. Yikes. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > > From: Blaze Spinnaker > >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

eturn on the paper and 20 in thepocket. > Best > Lennart Thornros > On Jan 6, 2014 6:33 PM, "Blaze Spinnaker" > wrote: > >> Fair points. >> >> Note that I am more mostly referring to Rossi and that LENR+ is currently >> available in some secret lab s

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

ty based versus faith based) made a focused attempt they could come up with better and more accurate probabilities than I. However, until they do, I'm all you got it looks like. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > This is based on > >- STMicro patent (Increase

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

"He hopes to launch another cold fusion project at Texas Tech." That and 25 cents will probably get you an apple from the grocery store. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > >> I don't see Duncan as a big deal, more o

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: BLP's announcement

"But, to properly focus a discussion, the term LENR refers to nuclear reactions that occur only at low applied energy in a solid structure." O i c. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > http://www.google.com/patents/EP2548257A2?cl=en > > You should not mention theory in a patent.

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: BLP's announcement

> > Mills mentions hydrino about 100 times in this latest patent application. > If this quantum state of the electron is not found to exist as defined in > his patent, is the patent still valid? He's probably either pretty confident it exists or he doesn't really care about the patent and it's ju

Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan interviews McKubre about Brillouin

Sigh. These statements and videos are ludicrous and frankly getting tiresome. 400% 4x .. gimme a break. If you actually have something, apply for a patent and go to the MFMP folks, and help them set it up to show the world otherwise just keep it tor yourself and stay invisible. On Wed, Jan 1

Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan interviews McKubre about Brillouin

ow issues associated with the patent office Blaze. And MFMP > is of course Open Source, while Brillouin is Proprietary. Apples and > Oranges. Can't Open Source everything (btw I am a huge OS proponent). Your > statement is just beyond silly. > > Regards, > John > > > > > O

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out of BLP and McKubre. Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

gt; > Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next indie > report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. > > Ditto. That's going to be exciting when it lands. > > Regards, > John > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, B

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

16, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> So, Dave, I guess you're at .. what? 95%? 90%? >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson wrote: >> >>> John, it does seem rather arbitrary how his game works and hopefully h

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

ld have to be shown iron clad evidence that the ECAT > does not generate additional heat beyond what is used for drive. That > would have to fall into the upper 90's. > > Dave > > > > -Original Message- > From: Blaze Spinnaker > To: vortex-l >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

ontrary to our own personal beliefs as to the legitimacy > of the technology. > > Regards, > John > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for >> saying 35%. >>

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

i? > > It's not like the balance of the world hinges on sorting this conversation > out, I'm just in a pugnacious mood and curious to know. > > Regards, > John > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> "but you seem to

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Yes, for those who don't have an opinion, that's true you're very right, they probably don't have an opinion. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > > >> But the reality is 99% o

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

10:1 > odds and within a matter of a couple of days you backtracked to 2:1 odds. > > In order to get money on the table you need to sweeten the pot. 2:1 odds > are almost not even worth it, especially seeing how you backtrack and hide > behind word usage, that kind of thing. > &g

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

XOM is still trading near historical highs, for example. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out > of BLP and McKubre. > > Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. T

Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Acquires E-Cat Technology

Bill Gates is very much focused on his legacy. Mr. Rossi 'effect' no doubt is as well. At a certain age, you appreciate your mortality and see things a bit different than younger folk do. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, leaking pen wrote: > I've never heard anyone malign his programming ski

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom Darden (investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior analyst at Cherokee, BA Economics) who are the players here. It'd be good to find out who those other investors are. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

disconnected to reality. I wouldn't > care except for the fact that you took money off the table. > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Kevin, you're very very confused about reality. I tend to avoid >> discussions with such pe

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

gt; > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Increasing the probability to 44% on the basis of Cherokee PR release. >> >> Big big BIG news. Now this is no longer about Rossi, but about Cherokee. >> >> I know you guys think I

Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Acquires E-Cat Technology

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2014/01/24/onfirmed-raleighs-cherokee-buys-into.html On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > Looks like Frank Acland was right on target with the Cherokee information > from a couple of weeks ago. Excellent work digging through the clut

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> We both used Intrade, Kevin. This is how it works. >> >> Changing news requires updating your priors constantly. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: >> >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Ahh, cheers. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Craig wrote: > On 01/24/2014 06:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > >> Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom Darden >> (investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior analyst at >> Cheroke

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Thornros wrote: > I think the validation should be more in this style > 10 up to minus 7 is stupid > 1% is next to stupid > 20% a hard call > 50% a good chance and with some support very likely > 80% JUST DO IT A SURE THING > The last two just requires atte

Re: [Vo]:Digital Journal reports on Industrial Heat deal with Rossi

> > > > I suppose the archives of this mailing list will be a mine-field for them. > It would be nice if the older stuff were easier to get at in a search > engine (rather than having to download in compressed form). > > Eric > > Absolutely! You should get Jed to host it or something.

[Vo]:History of Cherokee

Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred souls? Something more? Fellow con artists? You decide. "HISTORY In 1984, a group of investors including Tom Darden purchased four brick plants and

Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Acquires E-Cat Technology

You can't really compare DOS and UNIX. UNIX was built so researchers could share time on a big server system through dumb terminals. DOS was built for a single user on a low resource personal computer. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Eric Walker wrote: > > Gates was a

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

> > > This conversation is not like that because you are not a crowd of people. > You are only one person, and no one else here is hazarding a guess. > Oh, lots of people have hazard guesses. You don't know everything, Jed. :)

Re: [Vo]:SciAm cocktail physics still in denial

"all deluded and incompetent... or maybe... maybe someone else is deluded." Maybe a little aggressive :D On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2014/01/25/physics-week-in-review-january-25-2014/#comment-1011 > > > too

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

or NO condition, and if I believe judgement will be controversial, I will > post a prospective judgement to fx-discuss and forestall entering the > judgement for a comment period to be announced in the post. > > http://ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=CFsn > > > On Sat, Jan

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

0 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in > repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred > souls? Something more? Fellow con artists? You decide. > > "HISTORY > > In 1984, a gr

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

an 75 countries in the >> areas of health and pharmaceuticals, education and training, surveys and >> statistics, advanced technology, international development, economic and >> social policy, energy and the environment, and laboratory testing and >> chemical analysis. >> &g

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

; In the absence of such expectation, what this says to me is that Darden > has the background required to look into the "con" that Rossi was accused > of running in Italy and deciding whether it was indeed a "con" or whether > Rossi was falsely accused. > > >

[Vo]:Update on Jet Energy

Everyone catch this from ecatWorld? Looks like everyone is starting to pop up. http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/report-from-short-course-on-cold-fusion-at-mit/#comments *Here’s a report from Barry Simon who has been attending the course Cold Fusion 101: Introduction to Excess Power in Fleischm

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

rough, *“You of little faith,” he said, “why did you doubt?”* On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in > repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred > souls? Somet

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

http://lamppostreports.com/2013/08/08/faith-not-works/ On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > From JT Vaughn's latest blog posting: > > "When we are motivated by faith, hope and love, and when we trust that God > is the one who makes things grow, we shou

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

>From 2010: http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=6216 One of North Carolina’s real estate investments that has tanked is a commitment to invest $100 million in Cherokee Investment Partners IV, a fund run by a Raleigh company. The state had invested less than $7 mill

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

ote: > in 2007-2008, was there something that happened in real estate market ? > > > 2014-01-28 Blaze Spinnaker > > From 2010: >> >> http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=6216 >> >> One of North Carolina's real estate inve

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

if they had time to talk with Darden or if Darden timed the PR to coincide with Obama's visit. Interesting coincidences nonetheless. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Well, the comment is been made - this is a company that lives on the > largess of governmen

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

-carolina-company On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Interesting SOTU. > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/full-text-of-obamas-2014-state-of-the-union-address/2014/01/28/e0c93358-887f-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html > > "Let's continue

Re: [Vo]:History of Cherokee

-alindi/ On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Roundup of news: > > Our very good friend Mats: > http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3801145.ece > > > http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/175507-cold-fusion-tech-picked-up-by-major-us-partn

Re: [Vo]:General Fusion Founder to Speak at TED Conference

I don't get it. Why whinge like that? I think it's great they are trying. Let them take their best shot. Better than investing billions of dollars in SnapChat. On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Edmund Storms wrote: > This claim suffers from the same limitations that haunt laser fusion and >

Re: [Vo]:General Fusion Founder to Speak at TED Conference

try something else. Why not take a look at cold fusion for > a change? Instead, they keep exploring different variations of hot fusion, > all of which have the same basic problems. Remember what Einstein said > about insanity. > > Ed Storms > > On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Bla

Re: [Vo]:: RAR gravity engine

Yes, some combination of that and tidal forces from the moon, perhaps. On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote: > Perhaps the energy is coming from the rotational energy of the earth, i.e. > > Coriolis effect > > ( which as I look

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Put that back to 43%: > > Mr. Darden earned an MRP in environmental planning from the University of > North Carolina at Chapel Hill,* a JD from Yale Law S

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Also, anyone notice that XOM/Chevron are down 10% YTD? On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Put that ba

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

e the getting is good, thus driving the price of oil down quickly. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:05 PM, James Bowery wrote: > How much of their valuation is in the ground reserves? > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Also, anyone notice that

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

How about coal? BTU is down 15% YTD and Arch COal is down 12% YTD On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > >> It's also not hard to imagine Saudia Arabia and others panic dumping onto >> the market in order to get out while

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Why is it too early? I think the smart money (a very large chunk of the money) gets out before word gets around. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > > How about coal? BTU is down 15% YTD and Arch COa

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

If cold fusion is real, you can be assured that the smart money knows a lot more about it than you do.These people get paid millions of dollars a year to be on top of things like this. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > Why is it

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

I just asked bill gates on the AMA about cold fusion: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1xj56q/hello_reddit_im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill/cfbvi10 On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > James Bowery wrote: > > I bet the Israelis could pull it off without word getting ou

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

I think the idea is that it's supposed to be a question, not an advertisement for Cold Fusion. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > I just asked bill gates on the AMA about cold fusion: >> > > If that really is Bill

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

If someone had 50K I'd say try to buy a Nanor from Michael Swartz of Jet Energy and test that. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > If someone asked me "what kind of research can I do with $50,000?" I would > say go to the racetrack and bet the money. You will have more chan

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

items. > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. >> >> >> >>

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

rtain they have a correct understanding. This is like trying > to design heavier than air flight before the Wright Brothers or a durable > light bulb before Edison. Why not invest in getting knowledge? > > Ed Storms > > > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

he effect work and reported the > results. In addition, several of us have published attempts at an > explanation. So Swartz is not unique. The question is, "Is his > understanding correct?" As you admit, you are not qualified to judge. So, > how do you decide? > > Ed St

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Edmund Storms wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > Edmund - your thesis is that it's impossible to produce experimental > results without theoretical understanding. I'm not sure that thesis is > corr

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

' - Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high lenr+ cop That is news to me. What is the COP and what conditions is the value based on? ' Have you watched this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al7NMQLvATo >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Watch at 2:38:00 He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > ' > > >- Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high >lenr+ cop > > That is news to me. What is the COP and what con

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

ble claim by any standard. > > Ed Storms > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > Watch at 2:38:00 > > He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> ' &g

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Woah, wait. It's not " 4 mW of excess power .." It's 4mW of INPUT power. Watch the video before commenting, please! On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > 'Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on > only 4 mW o

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

> is clear now. If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, this would > be useful to basic research but not to a development study. My point is > that we need emphasis placed on basic research. > > Ed Storms > On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > >

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

watch the video before commenting. You guys are credible only when you talk about something you know. You're not coming off very credible here. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > 'Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture b

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

What I want to see is this thing hooked up to a minature sized sterling engine On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > I believe you are underestimating the value of a small and efficient LENR > device. I spoke with Mitchell about this on the bus at ICCF-18. I believe > small is

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

http://bettigue.blogspot.de/ This guy has very cool stirling engines. I wonder how much heat energy you need to run these, though perhaps they could be optimized for a Nanor device. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > What I want to see is this thing hooked up t

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

"There are many things about Swartz's techniques that I do not understand. My biggest question is: Why doesn't he gang up a number of these Nanor devices? If one puts out 100 mW, why not gang up 20 of them to put out 2 W? That is much easier to measure with confidence than 100 mW. The input power w

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

'The people at Cherokee have time. " I don't think so. If nanor goes out, it will be the big splash. Rossi will just be a johnny come lately and it will be known as the "Swartz Effect" On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Eric Walker wrote: > > The research has been driven

Re: [Vo]:Coming in out of the cold: nuclear fusion, for real

Pyroelectric fusion, old news. Though elements of it are used in the finnish patent. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p25s01-stss.html > > > Coming in out of the cold: nuclear fusion, for real > > By Michelle Thaller, csmonitor.com /

Re: [Vo]:Coming in out of the cold: nuclear fusion, for real

e Condensed Matter > LENR reaction taking place inside Nickel or Palladium. > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Blaze Spinnaker > wrote: > >> Pyroelectric fusion, old news. Though elements of it are used in the >> finnish patent. >> >> >> On Tue,

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

It's 27:1 .. it might work! On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, David L Babcock wrote: > On 2/11/2014 9:32 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > http://bettigue.blogspot.de/ >> >> This guy has very cool stirling engines. I wonder how muc

Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported

for less than a billionth of a second On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds > of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats. > > > 2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe : > > Claims of fusion by laser wi

Re: [Vo]:What if we live in a simulated reality?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/opinion/sunday/is-the-universe-a-simulation.html?_r=0 Our good friends bostrom, beane and savage are referenced. On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > http://metaversetribune.com/2011/08/22/rosedale-makes-case-for-holographic-un

[Vo]:Dr. Stoyan Sarg steps up

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/361-powder-push

Re: [Vo]:Transmutation via x-rays.

Actually it's via x-ray free electron lasers. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/20 > > Free-Electron Lasers Trigger Nuclear Transitions > > Physics is attempting to invent a mechanism for nuclear transmustation via > photons. > > Do you think

Re: [Vo]:Transmutation via x-rays.

NM I misread something. Carry on! On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Why can't I say photons? Aren't x-rays photons? Do lasers produce > something other than photons? > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < > blazespinna...@

Re: [Vo]:unknown mechanism generates voltage in the powder cracks

Axil, I don't get it. Why not optimize this for power generation? Find a way to generate cracks in a nano material with a small amount of electricity. Presumably there is an optimal material, shape, context in terms of gases present that causes this, and a better method than just 'shifting a Tu

Re: [Vo]:What if we live in a simulated reality?

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/20/does-the-big-bang-breakthrough-offer-proof-of-god/?hpt=hp_t4 It's sort of like minecraft and the simulator was seeded with the random number 42. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* Blaze Spinnaker > &

Re: [Vo]:Mizuno slides coming

Stop the teasin already :) On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Okay, I now have revised revised and revised expanded slides. Some from > Mizuno and some from Yoshino. I may not be able to upload them until > tomorrow. But you'll like 'em. > > I translated most of the text int

Re: [Vo]:US Examiner Addresses Andrea Rossi US Patent Application

The fundamental misstep of Rossi was this: ""The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it

Re: [Vo]:US Examiner Addresses Andrea Rossi US Patent Application

If the e-Cat pans out - not just a soap opera, but a fundamental re-evaluation of the how we should investigate and perceive physical reality itself. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > >> The Rossi opera - soapy or riveti

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >