us patent law
http://www.law.cornell.edu/patent/35uscs112.html
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:28 AM, MJ wrote:
> On 25-Jun-11 01:57, kbar42...@mypacks.net wrote:
>
>> A patent must teach one skilled in the art how to make and use the
>> invention. [...]
>
>
> In what planet?
>
> Mark Jordan
>
>
However, Integral's observations are about 10 000 times more accurate
than any previous and show that any quantum graininess must be at a
level of 10-48 m or smaller.
if none were detectable, thats also recreating the possibility that
there is no minimum size, no grain.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:
Superheated, and it requires some special circumstances.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> So here's a cute experiment, done by accident while on vacation.
>
> Take a smooth china mug, and fill it with water.
>
> Stir the water, so it's swirling nicely (if you don't do
Ive never done swirling, but if you heat to boiling, then let cool, it
removes a lot of gas, and lets you superheat tap water.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, J
ermmm... putting metal in microwave can be BD, mmmkay.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Man on Bridges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From what I know, is that when you want to boil a cup of water in a
> microwave (b.t.w. over here we tend to call it a magnetron),
> you are required to put a metal spoon
one of the big problems in trying to replicate is going to be the
phone. What carrier are they on, what model of phone? That will have
an effect on the frequency, which would be tied to the effect if real.
Personally, it looks like air to me, tubes hidden by the batteries.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 a
While I agree with you, this has been argued to DEATH and back.
Of course, I'd be willing to set up a Vortex Fan Page on Facebook if
anyone else here uses it.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> What about a forum instead of a discussion list?
>
>
no, it says its not as bad as worst case scenarios. Still increasing,
still holding in heat.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
>
> Frank Z
>
>
Its not an executable, .dat means its a data file. It has processing
instructions for outlook servers. Basically it means its not just
outlook, but a work server outlook.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> 2011/8/6 Terry Blanton :
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Alan J Fle
That was my thought. 1000 units throughout the country sounds like
google putting units into some of their mobile server trees.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Man on Bridges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8-8-2011 20:11, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Here's my pick of the hour! ;-)
>> Seattl
Its been mined for millions of years by the people who lived in a
planet in orbit around it who learned to mine their sun.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Man on Bridges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A faint star in the constellation of Leo (The Lion), called SDSS
> J102915+172927 [1], has been found to have
Note, Faster in ATMOSPHERE than light travels in ATMOSPHERE. not faster than C.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:45 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/22/scitech/main20110236.shtml
>
> Regards
> Steven Vincent Johnson
> www.OrionWorks.com
> www.zazzle.com/o
(neutrinos dont interact with the atmosphere) but it ISNT
big news, some reporter who thought they knew what they were talking
about heard about it and blew it out of proportion.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11-09-22 06:32 PM, Alexander H
xperiments that I've read about place the detector WAY underground... one
> used an old mine-shaft.
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: itsat...@gmail.com [mailto:itsat...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander
> Hollins
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 7:04 PM
>
Vorts,
So, when I first heard about zero point energy years back, I assumed
it was something I had already theorized myself when struggling with
the concepts of relativity (which still bugs me, for the reasons I'm
about to list) as I was mentally using the term Zero Point already.
Imagine my dissa
Well, my own mental gymnastics says that at such a velocity, mass
decreases to approach zero, and time slows towards zero as well, no?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
>> Vorts,
>>
>> So, when I first heard about zero point energy years back, I assumed
>> it was something I had
Wouldn't the light pulses only return at the same time if you also
were at the center of the sphere?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> In fact, the questions aren't nonsense; they just need to be carefully posed
> to get sensible answers out of them in a universe wher
Ahh, I gotcha. interesting.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On 11-09-23 02:42 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
>
> Wouldn't the light pulses only return at the same time if you also
> were at the center of the sphere?
>
> Sorry, I wasn&#
jed, if the power were used to, say, run a thermoelectric heat pump,
cooling one side of the pump, and heating something that was otherwise
internally insulated, then heat WOULD go up after power is removed.
(Just saying, if I were going to fake something, that's what I'd do. )
On Tue, Oct 11, 2
70, goto 10? well, only if you believe in reincarnation, I guess.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Michele Comitini
wrote:
> A Genius.
> He was 70, indeed.
>
> long:
> http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/business-of-it/2011/10/13/dennis-ritchie-father-of-unix-and-c-dies-40094176/
>
> short: http://goo.g
it would also explain the false starts. the solidox might have started
burning, then gone out on its own from cooling too much.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Jed, how about this:
>
> Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before and after, but not
> why it myst
a gui statistics generator.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> http://www.sharenator.com/w/lenr-canr.org
25 percent
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Quick, without Google, take a guess what percentage of land on the
> earth is antipodal, ie a line from the land drawn diametrically
> through the earth touches land?
>
> I was surprised at the answer.
>
> T
>
>
I take issue with the diagnosis. One of the primary symptoms of
asberger's is an inability to relate and discuss with other people,
and he seems to have no issue doing that.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1369595/Jacob-Barnett-12-h
You do not say anything about the numbers. Insulting the people
without talking about the numbers is worthless, and makes you look
like a troll and an imbecile. Is there something wrong with the
numbers they mentioned? Can you show math saying it IS possible to do
with chemical energy?
Alexande
The Clinton Administration had been acutely aware BL many years prior to the
Bush administration. BL could not be considered a new phenomenon by any
stretch of the imagination when the Bush administration took over.
Hell, during the changeover, Clinton and Bush had a joint security
meeting to brie
in our case, natural is a reference to whats found on earth, yes no?
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Michele Comitini
wrote:
> So I wonder what *Natural* isotopic abundance means? Is it an
> average? Over which part of the universe?
>
> Natural is keyword in food marketing, but here? :-)
>
> mic
I believe the question is, What is canister D2 in the patent?
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Angela Kemmler wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:48:37 +0300
>> Von: Peter Gluck
>> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Betreff: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next t
What did you THINK multiverse meant?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
> The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
>
> Authors: Raphael Bousso, Leonard Susskind
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3796
>
> We argue that the many-worlds of quantum mechanics and the many worl
on the
subject.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
> At 01:12 PM 6/1/2011, Alexander Hollins wrote:
>>
>> What did you THINK multiverse meant?
>
> Generally, multiverse has been used to explain the anthropic/goldilocks (not
> too hot, not too cold) eff
weird
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/10/dodecahedrons-purpose-remains-mystery/
>
> (see piccy)
>
> Can you do what the world's archaeologists can't? Can you explain this --
> thing?
>
> It’s been called a war weapon, a candlest
Crystaline matrix? Its also the natural shape of garnet.
One thing I've noticed looking online, while the linked example is a
hollow ball, a lot of them weren't completely hollow, they just had
shafts that met at the center, but they ALL had a central opening that
joined all the holes. I wonder i
The concentration of oxygen at that point would be so slight that most
methods of chemically removing it, any I can think of, simply won't
work.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Wm. Scott Smith wrote:
> I have wondered why a better vacuum might be made by filling it with oxygen,
> pumping it out
err, computer, not phone, terminally.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Alexander
Hollins wrote:
> it is able to use cell phones, but its not just for cells. many if not
> most twitterers do so from their phone.
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>> Tw
it is able to use cell phones, but its not just for cells. many if not
most twitterers do so from their phone.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Twitter is broadcast texting using an intermediary server to relay
> your cell phone text messages. It's limited to 140 characters
well just remove the infrared filter from any webcam, and its an
ir camera. quick and easy. what kind of definition are you looking
for?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
>> . . . I suggested infrared imaging and Ed said maybe you could get
isnt designing and refining experiments, removing uncontrolled
variables, and then repeating hte hell out of something until you stop
getting new data, a major part of science?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>> That a chemical attack of the CR-39 occu
work fine for me in firefox. i just wish they put up more pics.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> These links don't work on Firefox; but, they work fine on IE.
>
> Terry
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>> MIT students reached the stratosphere with a
an office i worked with experimented with random dimming of the light.
it very much simulated the occasional cloud passing overhead outside.
People were more alert and aware in the area they did this.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Kyle Mcallister
wrote:
> --- On Wed, 9/23/09, Jed Rothwell w
where you can run into large costs is if A. you have a business. they
force you to upper levels for unlimited. unlimited isnt quite
unlimited...
B. PROCCESOR costs. if you have something that uses a lot of
processor power, applications, things running off of mysql databases,
ect, you can look a
Dyson frightens me. As much as the Ibrand turns people into mindless
fan zombies, dysons do even more so. I had a neighbor that, after
buying a dyson vac, went on a crusade, and, on his own time, went door
to door vaccuming peoples houses to get them to go out and buy one.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 a
Its probably an automated system that just plugs in the domain of the
email itself into the form message.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
> Steven, although "hijacking" the email addresses of vortex posters
> would be extremely easy, without Bill being able to do anything a
>From the cdc reports, it has a higher morbidity rate in the 0-9 group,
about the same in 10-15, and lower overall in above 15. Of course,
significantly higher is misleading. morbidity rate for swine is about
150 percent of seasonal. this seems like a lot, until you realize it
means that seasona
pandemic means its around the globe, thats all. it means its easier
to CATCH it, not that it kills.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> Jed Rothwell wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> > You are quite wrong about that! This strain of influenza has a much
>> higher rate of
i am amused. I was one of the winners of the google 10 days in google
books contest, won an ereader. one of the first things i loaded was
a collection of Heinlein i downloaded a while ago but not yet read
through, buncha text iles. ive been going through it in alphabetical
order, and brown shoe
so, a generic patent for ns1 gene swine flu's with certain characteristics,
flues that were around back then. Its not a patent for the h1n1
specifically, let alone this exact version of the h1n1. Those were swine
flus that were already active in the swine community, so a vaccine for them
makes sen
well, 19.3 for gold and 19.5 for tungsten, as i recall.
There was a "fake gold" ring that was busted in china. It was reported as
chinese made bullion, and there is NO evidence of this crossover. The
article linked basically sounds like the disjointed, unconnected ravings of
a madman, based on "
Ooops, thats a type. heh. thanks.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Alexander Hollins
> wrote:
>>
>> well, 19.3 for gold and 19.5 for tungsten, as i recall.
>
> 19.25 g/cc to be more exact:
>
> h
well, if your cathode were also a superconducter, you'd be gold to go boom.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> This is a perennial subject. I suppose that cold fusion bombs are probably
> not possible, for the reasons given below, but I do not think suppose can
> roll them out
okay, WHERE was it published, is the big question.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
>> Yes, but it would be better if that document could be downloaded and/or
>> referenced from a goverment site.
>
> Yes, it would be better, but the DIA does not do that.
okay, so when they publish the read books, there is an actual printed
volume to go with it, yes? so get the name of it, if not simply OSD
Read Book, and the volume number. boom, proper citation.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Steven Krivit
wrote:
> At 06:47 AM 11/19/2009, you wrote:
>
> okay
so basically, london forces inside the protons? rock on.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Mark Iverson wrote:
>
> This just out at PhysOrg... (see at bottom of msg)
>
> What I find funny, in a sad kind of way, is the following statement:
>
> "So you have one set of data that tells you the mass-d
You know, as a writer, I'm tempted to take that final line as a
challenge. The only question, do i make the shroud be actually stains
of christ, or some other dude?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre5aj3d3-us-italy-galileo-find/
>
> Appare
ge of jesus, and they get the second coming
of christ, whos rather ticked at being brought back into the world
early.
h.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Alexander Hollins
> wrote:
>>
>> You know, as a wri
:
> Hey, I like it. Throw in that they also clone his wife Mary Magdeline and
> use her to extort Jesus for control of the earth. The Sufi's clone Mohammed
> and together he and Jesus rescue Mary and destroy the Illuminati forever.
>
> Terry
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at
I was going to say, we've enough evidence of twins , seperated at
birth, brought up in very different environments, being very similar
to each other as adults.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> This brings up the "nature vs nurture" debate - BUT - also let's update the
> scena
that only works for people sharing the same exchange server as you
(and using outlook)
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
> Mark Iverson would like to recall the message, "[Vo]:ONR Inspector General
> Helps New Energy Times
> Break Story".
>
Unless they artifically work the muscles, it will likely be similar to
veal, softer, less gamey meat. IE, higher quality to most peoples'
palates.
as for the "metaphysical" resistance. What a maroon.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> Steven Vincent Jo
Yeah, I commented before reading the article, my bad.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Alexander Hollins wrote:
>
>> Unless they artifically work the muscles, it will likely be similar to
>> veal, softer, less gamey meat. IE, higher quality to most p
agreed. even better, that same technology would mean growing
replacement meat, skin and wait for it
ORGANS!
and remember, its boil a bicep, fry an organ.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Rick Monteverde wrote:
>
>> This is rather scary. If they can do pig, could lo
There are cultures where, at a certain age, the elderly are ritually
killed, and served up to their tribe. NOT eating your dear aunt was
considered dreadfully insulting to her spirit. Very tight family
dynamics.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> Jed sez
>
>>
Hey, Bob was never above stealing from human cultures, heh.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> Hollins sez:
>
>> There are cultures where, at a certain age, the elderly
>> are ritually killed, and served up to their tribe. NOT
>> eating your dear aunt was cons
But the mad cow prions are only found in the brain and spinal cord.
just dont eat that part!
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/2009 09:32 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Rick Monteverde wrote:
>>
>>> Well, let's start with KJ ("mad cow") and go on from there.
But... your stomach acid dissolves it down. the genes from the meat
don't enter your body.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
> Sure it's propagated from a clean tested starter batch, etc. The problem is
> that what you don't know can kill you, and there's so much that is u
I agree that the "raw food" movement in terms of some claims (that the
natural enzymes are needederr what? you digest them into
amino acids..) is wrong headed, but... losing nutrition from NOT
cooking it? enh?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Alex
well, yes, early colonials in the americas ran into the same issue
with corn. but thats not ALL plants.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> There are even records of people stuck on desert islands and in the
>> Australian outback without fire who had plenty of foo
, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Alexander Hollins wrote:
>
>> well, yes, early colonials in the americas ran into the same issue with
>> corn. but thats not ALL plants.
>
> Yes, as I said, Wrangham makes it clear that some plants are fine to eat
> raw.
>
> As I said, some
(If it's a little poisonous to humans, well, what's it doing in a
food crop to start with? And if it's not even a little poisonous to
humans, why are there restrictions on how much of the toxin can be
present in the plant if it's to be sold as food? Hmph.)
because people screamed "franken food
* Happens to be." "He happens to be black." Like it's a fucking
accident, you know. He happens to be black? Yes, he happens to be
black. Ah, yes, yes, yes. He had two black parents? Oh, yes, that's
right, two black parents. And they fucked? Oh, indeed they did. So
where does the surprise part c
Its a comedy bit by george carlin, about "racial terms" that are
stupid. Such as happens to be. I posted it, as the phrase was used
in the email i was responding to.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Kyle Mcallister
wrote:
> --- On Fri, 12/4/09, Alexander Hollins wrote:
>
&g
Yeah, it wasnt the most rousing of harrison novels (im a huge
stainless steel rat fan, myself)
oh, well, perhaps I'm just paranoid. yeah, pretty much.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/2009 06:45 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
>>
&
Scientologists?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:23 PM, William Beaty wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
>> They are charging for getting a look at the technology, and, I'm
>> sure, this comes with heavy NDAs,
>
> Hey. Is "charging to get a look at technology" a dead givaway fo
Perhaps I misunderstand, but he seems to be describing the "companion
wave" as , like an em wave, but wavelength and frequency dont seem to
be tied. he calls it a 3d picture of a 4 d wave (which is how i think
of superstrings. they are a 3d crossection of a 4 d wave, hence the
growing shrinking b
nope, sorry, dont see it,.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:26 PM, William Beaty wrote:
> test
>
> (( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) )))
> William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
> billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
you could also call it an engine, could you not?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 4:10:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:steorn talk#2 today at 5pm irish time
Yeah, sorry, I meant generator (smacks self) A motor produces
movement to an object (not just electrical energy as stated earlier.
A rocket using solid chemicals to fly is just as much as "motor".
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Alexander Hollins wrote:
&
Its a condom, its a mint, is a condomint. does it go well on hot dogs?
/sorry, channeling robin williams there for a minute. )
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> It's a breath mint. It's a candy mint. No it's two mints in one.
>
> Silly me, bloody thing looks like a motor
perpendicular IS at a right angle
I would think that the arranged grid basically sets up channels that
the electrons flow through. by locking into step the valence
electrons, it would be like making a water current or jet stream,
you've removed drag.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Mark Iver
Is anyone here familiar with any organizations dedicated to helping
push along space travel?
Jack you beat me to what I would be asking for in about a year,
if other plans go to speed. THANK YOU SIR!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
wrote:
> AH: NASA Consultant & Engineer now private: Robert
> Zubrin->@Marssociety.org (he's the real deal) --&-
Thank you to both steves, steven and stephen. I've got them though, I
was hoping there were some others to add to my list?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:17 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> From Alexander:
>
>> Is anyone here familiar with any organizations dedicated
>> to helping push alon
unfortunately, space elevator research has stalled due to a lot of
issues with voltage differentials in the upper atmosphere. The last
test I heard of of stretching a ribbon between the ground and leo,
after it got about 5 miles long, it vaporized in a discharge, acting
as a ground. not pretty.
I did not look at the links page, thank you.
and ssi is exactly the kind of thing im looking for. thank you again.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On 01/25/2010 03:27 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
>> Thank you to both steves, steven and stephen.
best link ive found so far.
http://www.data4science.net/essays.php?EssayID=850
hmm, i think its the same one you are talking about. I THOUGHT there
was another one done, but i could be wrong.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On 01/25/2010 03:39 PM,
Ditto. I am in awe.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On 01/25/2010 04:09 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>> At 03:16 PM 1/25/2010, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 01/25/2010 03:08 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
&g
ve to be electrically conductive.
>
> Michel
>
> 2010/1/25 Alexander Hollins :
>> best link ive found so far.
>>
>> http://www.data4science.net/essays.php?EssayID=850
>> hmm, i think its the same one you are talking about. I THOUGHT there
>> was another on
neither do the many prominent scientists who agree with him.
neither do the many prominent technicians who agree with him. Fixed
that for you. They don't deserve the label scientist if they think
that way.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax quoted Huizeng
looks good to me. a LOT of people on this list use non html email
readers though.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Can the readers here see the two tables I just sent?
>
> The first one is from a spreadsheet output in HTML format. The second is
> copied from an on-line arti
The inventer is missing the real use of the device. He's invented the
Pap Blaster! Its a device from a novel by Spider Robinson that tracks
camera lenses, and zaps them with light lasers, preventing them from
taking coherent pictures. It was sold to celebrities to foil paparazi
(hence the name)
its information that is being collected generically, not about you
personally. therefore doesnt fall under search and seizure, as you
aren't being searched, and nothing is being seized. Im normally the
first to scream about big brother, but since they dont tie the data to
a person, why sweat it?
Attention Bill, I figured you'd find this interesting.
http://www.dump.com/2010/02/13/smoke-ring-collision/
Its two vortex rings of different colored smoke hitting each other
head on. Very cool.
http://serve.me.nus.edu.sg/limtt/
the creators
FLUID MECHANICS GROUP
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
National University of Singapore
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> From: Jed Rothwell
>
>
>
> Ø That's a splendid little video, and an elegant demonstration of spin
> c
At 2:30 a "ball" falls off to the sideand appears to splat on the
counter into fluid. Interesting.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:26 AM, David Jonsson
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can anyone explain this?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCeAfKCC2ng
>
> A fluid that forms balls in contact with air. Or is it fake?
>
I see no crystallization, i see a gel with a VERY high level of
internal cohesiveness and a hell of a surface tension.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> From: David Jonsson
>
>
>
>> What is the name of the phenomenon?
>
> Crystallization from a supersaturated solution.
>
>
>
>
working fine on my end.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Things seem stuck again . . .
>
>
No, I did not see that particular email.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> The two message I sent previously about How to see the text in
> image-over-text Acrobat files got caught in the Gmail spam filter. So they
> never came back to me.
>
> Plus a follow-up titled "Oops!"
I was under the impression that nuclear fusion means any process that
fuses the nuclei of two or more atoms.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> A question for the Vort Collective:
>
> Does the use of the term "Fusion" HAVE to imply there must exist a
> mechan
okay, this isnt a definition of Fusion youre looking for , but a
theory of how fusion works?
Two different things my friend.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:44 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> From Alexander:
>
>> I was under the impression that nuclear fusion means any process that
>> fuse
fusion means to make two things one. It is a much older term than
anything we use it to mean. One could say that pouring water into a
pan and adding sugar, you have made a fusion of water and sugar.
"Nuclear" fusion is something different. You are being way to general,
it seems to be.
On Tue, Ma
the larger picture being, "what we want them to think"
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> To reiterate, the cheap trick I referred to was removing the bottom of the
> graph (the zero line) and the numbers from the axes. Krivit says that was
> "simplified so people can get the
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
