At 09:23 AM 4/22/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Well Steven, did Laberge's
"multimillion dollar Vancouver digital imaging technology
company" also go under the next year? Probably.
Can one idea be energy's holy grail?
<
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/innovation/06/27/fusion/index.html
>
(CNN) -- Michel
At 10:09 AM 6/29/2011, Ron Kita wrote:
Cold Fusion LENR :
I was amazed to find this link:
http://www.economist.com/node/18774834/comments
Also made it to
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-20075206-54/a-reality-check-on-nuclear-fusion-at-mit/#comments
Not noted by the original author, though
At 07:55 AM 7/1/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
Many cosmological theories presume the pixel size of the universe is
the Planck Length (1.616 x 10^-35 m). ... Recent experimental data
implicates the universe pixel size is 10^13 smaller:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110630111540.htm
[ This message is delayed from yesterday's "prison" foo
]
The defkalion search is working pretty well for me.
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/search.php?keywords=&terms=all&author=Defkalion+GT
A couple of goodies :
Re: Who are we communicating with @ Defkalion GT
http://www.defkalion
At 12:54 PM 7/7/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
Nikola Tesla...
Ahhh .
At 01:48 PM 7/7/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
There's a Test 3 I haven't watched yet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17ser9_tGiU
Oops -- that's a different one -- Mr Powerpuff.
But it DOES show how water collects in the hose.
[ Delayed by jail-house-mail -- should be BEFORE my comment on test3 ]
At 11:16 AM 7/7/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Take a look at this video, simulating steam production at 1200W with a
4m long hose: .
What do you think?
Not enough controls.
But THIS guy's interesting TinselKoala (
At 03:18 PM 7/7/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This sounds like the heater is used only to bring the cell up to the
operating temperature to trigger the reaction. I think they said the
method of regulating the reaction is to vary gas pressure, rather
than Rossi's method of changing the auxiliary ele
Due to an overload in traffic and a bottleneck in moderating
discussions, Defkalion Green Technologies has decided to temporarily
freeze this Forums operation until further notice. All comments have
been welcomed. We thank you all for your participation. For those with an
interest to collaborate
At 11:27 AM 7/8/2011, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
http://www.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/yekim/BECNF-Ni-Hydrogen.pdf
This sounds familiar to posits by Jones Beene. Im not convinced it rules
out initial ZPE
Contributions but it sounds credible for explaining the nuclear
paths.
Regards
F
I've set up a survey at
http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22CPD9867MH/
Results can (I hope) be seen at:
http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsPasswordPage.aspx?ID=L26QG6QVBZQL
Malcolm
July 12th, 2011 at 5:02 AM
Thank you for your detailed reply to Dr. Mario Voltaggio. You mention
that the heating effect is due to gamma absorption by the lead. I assume
from this that the lead shielding is in fact in direct contact with the
copper water jacket and so the water is heat
At 10:11 AM 7/12/2011, Axil Axil wrote:
Dear Malcom,
Yes, also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
"Yes also" means that both the reaction vessel and the lead shield
both generated heat, IMHO.
the proportions are as follows: reaction vessel = a lot
Lead shied = a little.
Oops .. I goofed on summarizing Ros
At 11:58 AM 7/12/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
There's an audio interview with AR on the right column. He's at
home in Miami.
No "hard" questions. (Don't mention the Steam quality!) ... the only
clarification I got was that the original "factory heating" eCat was
no longer in operation. That fa
At 12:01 PM 7/12/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
This is straight from New Energy Times. Puzzling news, to say the least:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/12/uppsala-university-denies-rossi-research-agreement/
Professors Sven Kullander, retired from Uppsala
University, and Han
At 02:49 PM 7/12/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
My wife got this email from
AR:
Dear Marcia,
I never said that we have a contract with the University of Uppsala.
Professors of the University of Uppsala made test with our
apparatus,
but without a contract. It has been a free, indipendent test. We are
i
Thanks for all your responses. I've closed it, but the results are
still available
http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsPasswordPage.aspx?ID=L26QG6QVBZQL
Pretty bimodal :
Definitely a
problem 33 41%
Probably a
problem
7 9%
Don't know/ don't care 7
9%
Prob
Also :
Andrea Rossi
June 17th, 2011 at 3:10 PM
Dear Maryyugo:
We have already made enough public tests ...
About the work that we will make with the University of Bologna and
Uppsala, this will not be a public demo, but a work of Research and
Development, made closed doors.
Warm Regards,
A.
Krivit has modified his statement :
Professors Sven Kullander, retired from Uppsala University, and Hanno
Essén, with the Royal Institute of Technology,
endorsed Rossis claimed technology in a news story on Feb. 23, 2011,
before they had seen or inspected the device <***> on
March 29. <***>
With the stop/go mailing, I'm not sure if this is old news : Krivit
has added a link from his main blog page to
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/AndreaRossiAndHisEnergy-Catalyzer.shtml
(Latest entry July 5) where he seems to be collecting all the
Rossi-specific stuff.
http://pesn.com/2011/07/14/9501869_EV-World_Interviews_Andrea_Rossi/
At 09:42 AM 7/15/2011, Harry Veeder wrote:
Since only Rossi and Levi were present at the 18 hr test, it is
possible that Rossi fooled Levi by tampering with the instruments
prior to the tests.
Krivit gave us an observer list at
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/RossiECatPortal.shtml
At 03:21 PM 7/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
It contains some interesting bits of information. I
Martin
July 14th, 2011 at 1:57 PM
Dear mr Rossi,
Today there was a meeting with NASA about your invention. Is it possible
to give some information about this meeting? If it is not possible no
problem!
Im just very curious.
Best regards
Martin
Andrea Rossi
July 15th, 2011 at 7:24 AM
Dear Ma
Cold Fusion, Warm Future. A New Day Dawning?
http://www.thesussexnewspaper.com/columnists/3061-cold-fusion-warm-future-a-new-day-dawning.html
You may be happy to learn that while lunatics have been busy knocking
seven bells out of foreign countries so as to purloin oil, which is soon
going to r
At 01:56 AM 7/18/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Yeap. This is what I expect
transpire:-
A 1 MW unit will be qualified in the very same way the individual devices
have been qualified: volumetric input of liquid water will be compared to
electric power input.
It should be a marketing success.
Andrea
At 10:02 AM 7/18/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
[ I thought that Defkalion said they were taking orders for small
Hyperions in November. ]
Their products page says
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/products
The 1MW Hyperion will be inaugurated in Q4 of 2011 with its
production phase to commence
At 12:28 PM 7/24/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
The 2011 Cold Fusion/Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions Colloquium
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Part I
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/LANR2011Colloq.pdf
Is it just me ... or is there an Elephant in the room?
At 10:41 AM 7/25/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 12:28 PM 7/24/2011, Terry
Blanton wrote:
The 2011 Cold
Fusion/Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions Colloquium
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Part I
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/LANR2011Colloq.pdf
Is it just me ... or
At 11:20 AM 7/25/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo
I counted 11 passes ... but .. umm ... NO !
At 10:55 PM 7/26/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
Fran and Jones...
This also may involve Casimir effects, but on a Hubble scale...
Haven't heard of that before!
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-gyroscope-unexplained-due-inertia.html
"McCulloch proposes that the gyroscope's inertial mass is deter
At 09:36 AM 7/29/2011, Rich Murray wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/29/new-energy-times-report-3-on-rossi-device-coming-soon/
Careful observers have noticed that Rossi is not claiming a 1
megawatt electrical device but a 1 megawatt thermal device. They have
also noticed that Ross
Brian Josephson
July 30th, 2011 at 4:17 AM
October demo
Andrea,
Youve said the 1MW E-cat due in October will be the real test, but in
what way will it be more convincing than the ones done so far? Will it be
done in such a way that people are sure about the amount of water/steam
coming out of
Marcia Pires
July 30th, 2011 at 11:24 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How much heat of the reactor is absorbed by the water and how much is
absorbed by the solid parts of the e-cat?
Best wishes,
Marcia Pires
Andrea Rossi
July 30th, 2011 at 11:52 AM
Dear Marcia Pires:
The reactor is very well insulate
Andrea Rossi
July 29th, 2011 at 4:59 PM
Dear Lars:
.
The progression of my work, that as you know is focused on the
manufacturing of the 1 MW plant, is very good and we are perfectly in
time for the scheduled delivery in October. You bet. If some skeptic will
tell you that for some reason
Andrea Rossi
July 31st, 2011 at 5:36 PM
Dear Rick Gresham:
We can reach 500 Celsius, but in a very instable mode. The lower is the
T, the higher the stability. At the moment, to turn off the input power,
we must make steam at 100.1-101 Celsius; above this limit we need the
drive, we are able t
I've read the whole thing a couple of times, and been through the
appendices once.
I'm still struck by Krivit's overall snarkiness -- and also he's ignoring
recent Rossi claims.
I'm not commenting on ANY of the steam-quality issues.
> Last year Rossi and Focardi claimed an energy gain of 213 tim
From
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/31/new-energy-times-publishes-report-3-on-rossi-device-2/
A reader sent in specs for Rossi's "off the shelf" controller
module
http://www.gsei.it/attachs/P020_01.pdf
VL676 FEEDER WITH RELAY 'STATIC PHASE
10A - 20A 230/400Vac
TWO PROGRAMMABLE FUNCTIO
Swedish man caught trying to split atoms at home
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/08/03/international/i08D22.DTL#ixzz1U05lkxzV
A Swedish man who was arrested after trying to split atoms in
his kitchen said Wednesday he was only doing it as a hobby.
Richard Handl told The
I previously asked whether steam is a problem :
http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsPasswordPage.aspx?ID=L26QG6QVBZQL
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg49076.html
I'm thinking of setting up a new poll.
a) Old question, again : Is the eCat steam quality a problem?
D
At 07:27 AM 8/5/2011, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
>
Do you now think the eCat is Real or Fake?
Definetly a scientific scam
WHOA This isn't the actual poll . coming up REAL SOON !!!
At 09:37 AM 8/5/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
WHOA This isn't the actual poll . coming up REAL SOON !!!
http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22CU6CZ3P9U/
results will be at:
http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsPasswordPage.aspx?ID=L26VBL22QQQG
At 12:27 PM 8/5/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Hold the presses.
I can't load that. Is there a link to it somewhere?
At 01:18 PM 8/5/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I can't load that. Is there a link to it somewhere?
I meant the winmail.dat attachment ... but that seems to be attached
to all your posts. I thought it contained the scoop on your "hold the presses".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuHJBIMj_rs&NR=1
Is that steam quality OK ?
At 04:03 PM 8/5/2011, Enzo wrote:
For the announcement of the University of Bologna take a look here:
http://www.df.unibo.it/bacheca/bacheca.htm
Google translate of PDF file :
Notice (google says "Warning)
Bologna 29 June 2011
The Department of Physics of the Alma Mater
Studiorum - Universit
Here's an interesting device, for 'thought' or possible real experiments
http://www.spiraxsarco.com/pdfs/TI/p023_59.pdf
Given low-quality steam (steam mixed with water and air) this device
separates it into dry steam, air and water.
For the ecat, there will be little or no air after it's run f
At 09:46 AM 8/5/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
results will be at:
http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsPasswordPage.aspx?ID=L26VBL22QQQG
I closed the poll -- in part because any future replies would be
heavily skewed by the Rossi/Defkalion news.
The fake/real spilt wasn't qui
Rossi's been making frequent posts -- one of his latest:
Andrea Rossi
August 7th, 2011 at 2:22 PM
Dear Georgehants:
Prof. Stremmenos has tested our E-Cats many times in Bologna and has made
a very good work; I do not know what has been done in Greece from
Deflalion with the documents made by
At 11:37 AM 8/8/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wrote: One or the other has to
be lying.
PESN agrees with me. See:
http://pesn.com/2011/08/07/9501887_An_E-Cat_Full_of_Lies_-_Rossi_or_Defkalion/
This is a good summary of Rossi versus Defkalion claims, and Defkalion's
statements about testing in the
Andrea Rossi
August 8th, 2011 at 1:38 PM
Dear Alessandro Casali:
I repeat that the reason of the split from Defkalion has been only and
exclusively financial.
As for all the other issue: as all our Readers know, I always said that
we would have been ready for the market from November only with
At 12:01 PM 8/8/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
August 8th, 2011 at 1:38 PM
the only problem has been that
they were delaying from months their financial duties, until it has not
been possible to go ahead. Of course, since they have not respected what
due,
Which contradicts
Q1) Is your new customer going to produce e-cats under licence or is
it just going to buy e-cats from you?
(ajf: Presumably US customer)
1- Buy from Leonardo Corporation
Q2) When do you think will the R&D with Bologna University start?
before or after the 1MW plant?
2- We didn't deci
At 09:26 AM 8/10/2011, Michael Ivanov wrote:
BTW - what about Ampenergo who supposed to be a sole distributor in US?
No -- they're the middle-man. It was always said that they would
license others.
http://pesn.com/2011/08/10/9501891_Defkalion_Responds_in_Support_of_Rossi/
Sorry if it's already here ... I looked for it.
Hard to well if it's actually conflicting with what Rossi as said
(technically).
They say it's built AROUND the core (not that they have one), AND that
they have (are?)
At 11:05 AM 8/10/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://pesn.com/2011/08/10/9501891_Defkalion_Responds_in_Support_of_Rossi/
Andrea Rossi
August 10th, 2011 at 4:02 AM
Dear Luke Mortensen:
No one in the world holds any E-Cat, but us, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hard to well if it's act
At 01:30 PM 8/10/2011, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
That's exactly what Larson's Reciprocal System unified theory says:
particles are in contact if they are either adjacent in 3D space or 3D
time.
Space/Time? That's SO last-millenium!
Beyond space-time: Welcome to phase space
http://www.newscien
At 01:46 PM 8/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Rossi could have hand-carried a core to Defkalion, run tests, and
then taken it way with him.
No regulator or government agency in the EU, the U.S. or Japan would
allow that. It is unthinkable. These organizations have many
At 12:13 PM 8/11/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
Doesn't mean they don't know the sauce.
I'm with Terry on this one. They've could just have designed the
correct hoppers, feeds, mixers etc etc to add the sauce,
They can do this from a technical specification without knowing the secret.
If and wh
Andrea Rossi
August 12th, 2011 at 10:58 AM
TO ALL OUR READERS: TODAY HAS BEEN PUBLISHED ON THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR
PHYSICS THE VERY INTERESTING PAPER
COLD NUCLEAR FUSION
OF E.N. TSYGANOV, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN, TEXAS, USA.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510
At 12:26 PM 8/13/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
JCCoLDS? Well they
certainly have the money. And the distribution channel.
Next time the young missionaries knock on your door, they might say,
"We just came here to share our point of view and sell you a
Hyperion
at our cost if you just give us a few
http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_steam_v410A.php (Working
Draft)
Comments and corrections appreciated -- either through vortex or directly
AbstractThe issue of Steam Quality greatly impacts the
calculations on the actual excess energy.
This issue is extensively analyzed by Steven B. Krivit in
At 11:05 AM 8/17/2011, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll answer your points in detail later. As I said, it's a work in progress.
But I specifically indicate that the "dryout" is the point at which
there is no liquid water on the tube wall. There IS still liquid
water in the form of droplets in t
At 11:18 AM 8/17/2011, you wrote:
I have some corrections though. In one of the appendices, I have to
find where, the loss in a 4m hose is about 400W. Rossi said that the
ecat wastes 100W within the bulk of the device. So, the actual
output is 3/4*(4900-500)= 3300W. I suppose there are also was
At 12:11 PM 8/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
BTW, I think Krivit won't accept anything you write. He wants just
negative opinions about Rossi.
Maybe not but Rossi might !! (and I have another publication channel).
At 12:26 PM 8/17/2011, Joe Catania wrote:
How do you explain
the low velocity of steam at exit of E-Cat? This surely damns 75%
dryness?
I'm not convinced that has been proved.
Please post a link
which covers Kettle & Tube boilers and Dryout .
Kettle isn't very relevant to the eCat. Follow the W
A new version is up : http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_steam_v410B.php
I've rewritten it distinguishing FLUID from LIQUID, and replaced Watts by "W".
And I found a new diagram for the Drypout, which is explicitly scaled
to the flow pattern diagram:
http://lenr.qumbu.com/steampics/110816_steam_
At 12:43 PM 8/17/2011, you wrote:
At 02:36 PM 8/17/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 11:05 AM 8/17/2011, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll answer your points in detail later. As I said, it's a work in progress.
But I specifically indicate that the "dryout" is the point a
At 04:11 PM 8/17/2011, Joe Catania wrote:
The NASA
calculations seem to have no validity. It dosen't seem possible to pin
down the quality. There is not enough information to do so.
That's my whole point. There IS enough information. In fact, the
temperatures and pressure don't matter.
The inpu
At 05:09 PM 8/17/2011, Joe Catania wrote:
I don't think so.
The quality can be anything from 0 to 1 but it is likely to be very wet.
There is no diagram that can tell you the quality as is insinuated in the
Nasa article. Chimney overflowing with what?
Overflowing with fluid, liquid water.
At 04:41 PM 8/17/2011, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll take on your bet that a 5% Dry fully-atomized stream is
possible. One pint of beer/glass of wine ?
I don't drink alcohol. Read the name.
My apologies. Equivalent value, then ... say $5. Means of delivery to
be determined.
At 04:41 PM 8/17/2011, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
That's 11 litres or 3 Gallons. I think he'd have noticed that.
Lewan found about half the water ended up in the bucket. He noticed
it, in other words, he measured it. Unfortunately, he did not
examine it closely enough. It would have been far
At 08:08 PM 8/17/2011, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Your figure of 75% you seem to have made up. You wrote:
No, I read it off this chart by Steiner-Taborek :
http://lenr.qumbu.com/steampics/110816_steam_0014.png
I have presented ample evidence that dryout occurs, that it
correlates with steam q
I've put up a new version at http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_steam_v410C.php
Scroll down to 11 "Work in Progress" -- where I review some stuff on
flow diagrams.
Unfortunately the calculations needed to derive the drypoint (and
other stages) are beyond my capability and resources.
However,
I've been having some off-vortex action with this.
Latest version is at http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_steam_v410E.php
My attention was drawn to an excellent Rossi eCat simulator by a Rick Cantwell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXTl8z_2Uqo
(It's main deficiency is that he's measuring tempera
At 05:43 AM 8/23/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
Some consolidated and clarified
text follows.
... I'm heading out for a couple of days, so I don't have time to check
your method or numbers
(assuming a 94 °C boiling point)
of:
Isn't that a bit low?
You still need to take into account the fact that th
At 07:48 AM 8/25/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
No one has raised a valid
objections to the flowing water test as far as I know. Your objection
seem to be that you want to see the number "5°C" repeated a
thousand times. Go ahead and use a word processor to repeat it
yourself:
5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5
I've been working on a javascript program for generating
Temperature-Enthalpy Diagrams.
http://lenr.qumbu.com/jsxgraph_h.php
Following NASA's diagram in Krivit's Appendix 9 the Enthalpy is
scaled to kWh, for the given input flow.
I've set it up so that I can draw a "path" on the diagram --
At 10:57 AM 8/31/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:The URLs for all interviews are
listed here:
http://rossiportal.com/
- Jed
Sources that Support the Rossi Claim?
<
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/08/26/sources-that-support-the-rossi-claim/
>
A few days ago he was soliciting information on sites sup
At 09:01 AM 9/1/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
This post is just to check my understanding of the supposed structure
of the Rossi device.
I think that this (speculative!) diagram best shows the location of
the heating resistors.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3724appendixc8.shtml
o
Enzo
September 2nd, 2011 at 12:51 AM
Dear Dr. Rossi,
good luck for tomorrow
Andrea Rossi
September 2nd, 2011 at 3:10 AM
Dear Enzo:
I always am delighted of good luck wishes, but
what happens tomorrow of
special?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
At 04:57 PM 9/1/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
The total power of resisters (in your drawing) at 300 W + 300 W = 600
W seems low. Rossi states in Krivit's film he is using 748 watts,
from which I did the following computations:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/KrivitFilm.pdf
In another demo the
At 01:04 PM 9/2/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
So we have either
"9+3" : 9/9 * 300W + 3/9 * R2 = (770W -
65W) giving R2 =
1215W and maximum power at "9+9" is 1515W
"3+9" : 3/9 * 300W + 9/9 * R2 = (770W -
65W) giving R2 =
605W and maximum power at "9+9" is 905W
If we could trace th
At 01:54 PM 9/2/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
That was just a first-order calculation. I presumed the maximum
wattages are for the same input voltages.
You can do the whole V=IR foo if you want to, but you don't know the
voltages applied to the resistors or the resistor values thems
At 02:14 PM 9/2/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Krivit's picture of the control box shows no transformers
Maybe there IS a transformer in there (hard to tell).
Jason Le Leivre
September 8th, 2011 at 6:17 AM
In the past you have indicated that your Ni fuel charge is prepared by a
single elderly gentleman in his 90 s. Has he been responsible for the
fuel for all 300 reactors in your 1MW device or do you have a new
preparation system better suited to ma
I finally got round to finishing my ecat steam calculator, and
entered all of the steam experiments.
http://lenr.qumbu.com/steam_calc.php
See the Help file for details.
I have most of the important steam parameters available, so I could
easily add other calculations -- eg I could calculate the
At 12:21 PM 9/9/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Grimshaw, T., Evidence-Based
Public Policy toward Cold Fusion: Rational Choices for a Potential
Alternative Energy Source. 2008, The University of Texas at
Austin.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GrimshawTevidenceba.pdf
A good read ... but doubt that any M
At 05:00 AM 9/14/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
These test results are indeed
difficult to explain.
And (regrettably) incomplete. We know that the power to the resistor was
being cycled on and off, but not the actual duty ratio!
Water came out -- but we don't know its temperature.
I have one
quest
At 09:52 AM 9/14/2011, Rich Murray wrote:
Richard M. < Any relation, I wonder?
September 14th, 2011 at 3:33 AM
Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi,
If you could spare a bit of time, I have a few questions.
1)Could you please inform us as to the reactor core volume of the new
E-Cat modules?
At 01:55 PM 9/14/2011, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
We know that the Setting is referring to the
duty cycle, but we do not know exactly what the
relationship is
since 9 is the MAXimum setting,
and Lewan states power was at this point
constantly switched on, then a setting of 9
is pres
At 08:25 AM 9/15/2011, Joe Catania wrote:
> There would appear to be from 17 to 20L of water stored
in the E-Cat.
Rossi said the reactor volume is 30L -- but this includes space for water
and for steam.
Taking the time from when the pump was started to when overflow started
-- 1.77 hrs x The in
At 10:45 AM 9/15/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
WTH?!?!
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/09/15/collected-comments-on-sept-7-afternoon-rossi-test/
Krivit posted an Horace's post without the context, that is, Jouni's post
and answer to that! It looks like Krivit is trying to smear someone he
disag
At 11:19 AM 9/15/2011, Peter Heckert wrote:
So we know all input conditions and we know all output condition and
therefore we can calculate the energy.
I've coded up the data --
http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_sep11_a.php -- displayed both as a
table and as CSV data which you can load into
At 01:21 PM 9/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 11:19 AM 9/15/2011, Peter Heckert wrote:
So we know all input conditions and we know all output condition
and therefore we can calculate the energy.
I've coded up the data --
http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_sep11_a.php -- displayed both
I'm still trying to figure out what's going on!
The outlet port is very high on the unit ... if it was just the overflow
from a kettle boiler then there wouldn't be any room for steam.
I might have to go back to thinking of it as a Tube boiler, where the
flow of the steam carries the water with i
At 10:34 AM 9/16/2011, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
> From: Jones Beene
[
mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
> Hey guys - isn't Rossi-mania already reading like a geek gossip
column?
You mean a greek geek gossip column!
For Defkalion, it's a piqued greek geek gossip column!
At 11:24 AM 9/16/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Thanks for your comments I'm still looking at the whole picture.
This is also the reason, why I do not believe that two chambered inner
structure. We do not have any evidence that would support the idea of
superheated steam and also I do not se
At 11:57 AM 9/16/2011, Peter Heckert wrote:
The important information is: There is no superheated steam because
inside the ecat is everything almost at boiling temperature. For
superheated steam you need an extra heater that heats the steam and
there is none.
Because the temperature inside the
At 11:45 AM 9/16/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Still I find it baffling why there was no bump in the graph, when
power was cut off? Do you Alan or anyone else have any ideas?
There isn't a bump in the graph when it's heating up,
either. Previously we've seen a distinct increase in the slope whe
1 - 100 of 807 matches
Mail list logo
