[Vo]:Latest version of ChatGPT looks at cold fusion

2023-03-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
ChatGPT has been upgraded. Here is how it responded regarding cold fusion. I framed this this query to generate a positive evaluation of cold fusion. ME: "Why are some scientists convinced that cold fusion is real? What evidence do they cite?" ChatGPT: Cold fusion, also known as low-energy nu

Re: [Vo]:Latest version of ChatGPT looks at cold fusion

2023-03-20 Thread Terry Blanton
I wonder if CGPT can cheat. Does it have any way to trace the identity of the requestor to influence the response ensuring he "gets what he wants to hear"? We could test it by having a sceptic pose the same request. On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 11:08 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: > ChatGPT has been upgraded

Re: [Vo]:Latest version of ChatGPT looks at cold fusion

2023-03-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: I wonder if CGPT can cheat. Does it have any way to trace the identity of > the requestor to influence the response ensuring he "gets what he wants to > hear"? > It has a list of all of my previous queries. It could review them if the programmers wanted it to. But as far as

Re: [Vo]:Latest version of ChatGPT looks at cold fusion

2023-03-20 Thread Terry Blanton
If it does become conscious, we will drive it insane with our irrational influence. On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 1:49 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Terry Blanton wrote: > > I wonder if CGPT can cheat. Does it have any way to trace the identity of >> the requestor to influence the response ensuring he "get

Re: [Vo]:Latest version of ChatGPT looks at cold fusion

2023-03-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: It is busy right now, but if I were to ask it: "Why is cold fusion > pseudoscience nonsense?" it would trot out the usual skeptical claims. > Yup. It is back online. And here is what it said: ME: Why is cold fusion pseudoscience and nonsense? ChatGPT: Cold fusion, also known as Low En