[Vo]:Muon catalyzed fusion - the lasting legacy of LENR ?

2020-08-22 Thread Jones Beene
The Wiki entry for muon catalyzed fusion has been updated to include the new advancement of Norront Fusion of Norway, using the techniques of Dr Leif Holmlid of Sweden to produce muons easily and cheaply without the requirement of a beam line. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion

Re: [Vo]:Muon catalyzed fusion - the lasting legacy of LENR ?

2020-08-22 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
The problem with the Holmlid way of fusion 9H --> 2 4-He + K^o ,K^+ is, it wastes almost all fusion energy (53MeV) in kinetic particles. Muon production  rate is low. Further muon catalyzed fusion is very dirty and mostly produces kinetic neutrons like in hot fusion. If one could harvest the e

Re: [Vo]:Muon catalyzed fusion - the lasting legacy of LENR ?

2020-08-22 Thread Axil Axil
There are numerous societies out on the internet that support out of the mainstream science theory. One such example has gone so far as to bravely test their ideas are the electric universe society using rigorous scientific methods designed by an independent professional third party contractor. U

Re: [Vo]:The Oumuamua anomaly

2020-08-22 Thread H LV
Some magnetic field effects have been modeled but they don't produce the observed discrepancy. harry On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:37:02 + > (UTC): > Hi, > [snip] > > To me it looks like a nickel-iron meteor. Acceler

Re: [Vo]:Muon catalyzed fusion - the lasting legacy of LENR ?

2020-08-22 Thread Robin
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:30:43 +0200: Hi, [snip] >The problem with the Holmlid way of fusion > >9H --> 2 4-He + K^o ,K^+ is, it wastes almost all fusion energy (53MeV) >in kinetic particles. It need not be a waste, if you have an absorber that is large enough

Re: [Vo]:The Oumuamua anomaly

2020-08-22 Thread Robin
In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:41:54 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Some magnetic field effects have been modeled but they don't produce the >observed discrepancy. I think it would be hard to model correctly without knowing the exact composition of the thing, or distribution of the materi

[Vo]:The geometry of observation vs the geometry of explanation

2020-08-22 Thread H LV
Consider the two animated gifs. The one on the left is a Newtonian prediction of the trajectory of a test particle around a massive star. The one on the right is the GR prediction of the trajectory with the striking difference that it predicts the precession of the perihelion. https://en.wikipedia