Even there would be a conventional way to explain the explosion, it may be
worth to check the presence of ionizing particles at this short moment. Could
be an affordable instrument for that?
H Ucar
-- Original message--From: jjamdix@gmail.comDate: Mon, Nov 9, 2015
16:08To: vortex-L@eski
It still seems to happen, but yeah you're right, way less energetic.
But still an explosion: https://youtu.be/vRKK6pliejs?t=43
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:35 AM, John Berry
> wrote:
>
> I wonder if Rossi style LENR is based on a sub-critical
Check this out - Nature 1999FYI:
Just in passing, I would like to note (to others, at least) that this Nature
Paper is Reference [4] in Holmlid’s 2014 Paper:
Ultra-Dense Hydrogen H(−1) as the Cause of Instabilities in Laser
Compression-Based Nuclear Fusion
http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.p
Good question. A cellphone app maybe?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:40 PM, jjam...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Even there would be a conventional way to explain the explosion, it may be
> worth to check the presence of ionizing particles at this short moment.
> Could be an affordable instrument for that?
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Giant_Utilities_Try_to_Kill_Solar_Power/47222/0/38/38/Y/M.html
Remember, conspiracies don't exist.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:07 AM, John Berry wrote:
It still seems to happen, but yeah you're right, way less energetic.
>
> But still an explosion: https://youtu.be/vRKK6pliejs?t=43
>
You're right. I didn't let it play long enough. But yes, much less
energetic.
A possible test of the explanat
Good point, Mark – since this detail is easy to overlook. I wonder how many of
the geniuses at Livermore really have understood what Holmlid is saying.
Amazingly, if we can believe it - the Holmlid work not only provides a shortcut
to achieving breakeven in laser fusion, BUT ALSO explains why
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> The web page does not have the quality you would expect from Apple.
Don't get me wrong. I wasn't implying that it wasn't real. It would
be wise for Apple to not show their hand.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:40 AM, jjam...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Even there would be a conventional way to explain the explosion, it may be
> worth to check the presence of ionizing particles at this short moment.
> Could be an affordable instrument for that?
Photographic film. If you can find such
Two things about this are significant. First, they got into the Capital.
Second, McKubre endorsed their results.
I would like to see McKubre's report.
See:
http://coldfusionnow.org/brillouin-energy-corp-hosts-information-session-on-lenr-thermal-energy-technology-at-u-s-capitol/
Quote:
Brillou
This announcement could be much bigger than anything Rossi has done, since
McKubre/SRI is independent, well-respected, and usually is more circumspect
about operating results than this.
However, the Ni-H device sounds similar enough to the HotCat that we can
probably expect patent litigatio
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
However, the Ni-H device sounds similar enough to the HotCat that we can
> probably expect patent litigation at some point.
Given the so-far succesful challenge on the part of Rossi's legal team of
one of Piantelli's patents, this seems likely
However, unless Godes is using LAH catalyst – what can Rossi really challenge?
Here is Godes patent which relates to a generic pulsing circuit
http://www.google.com/patents/US8624636
Not much to challenge there, and Thermacore has the basic Ni-H covered
(expired) and Mills has the alkali
Hi Chris,
No, I do not think it is conspiracy.
I live in California and I have solar.
PGnE is my provider. A few years ago they should have been bankrupt. Just
like GM they were to big to be allowed to fail. *Here is the real problem.*
Now the state interfered in the free market. Not for the protec
Usa are not the centre of the World, if China and Russia start utilizing
Lenr, Usa can only follow through!
Il 10/11/2015 17:46, Lennart Thornros ha scritto:
Hi Chris,
No, I do not think it is conspiracy.
I live in California and I have solar.
PGnE is my provider. A few years ago they should h
Hello Aldo,
I agree with that.
The issue is rather who will benefit? It differs between the countries you
say - but just on the surface.
Personally I think it is a question of changing the way we think that
everything "bigger is better". I think that is a US say, btw.
Instead small and flexible is
I am eagerly watching the decline of the US Empire and hoping that it’s end
will finally break the logjam of technological stagnation that plagues the
world.
Remember when President Crater was putting up solar panels about 40 years ago?
Do we have (hot) fusion now? Nope. How about a cure for c
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/11/10-nov-2015-brillouin-s-day-genuine.html
Best,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Hello Chris,
I guess you and I have different ideas about what is good.
How can something negative be positive.
Personally I am sorry for the US decline, which I acknowledge.
I think that it is negative to people everywhere.
The reason we see this decline is the inability to change with the times.
Jones,
I agree that this could be bigger than anything Rossi has done. Sadly, we
still don't have a test from the Rossi camp (or replicators) that can even
convince many supporters of a COP much over 1.5, let alone skeptics. Godes
has always asserted that he thinks Rossi has something, but Rossi
“Positive” viewpoints can be harmful if you’re being cheated or conned and
that’s mostly what’s happening across the world. The conservative forces that
you won’t call a conspiracy tend to make our world into a zero-sum game. I
don’t know what it will take to break this situation apart but I th
Chris Zell wrote:
>
> http://www.blacklistednews.com/Giant_Utilities_Try_to_Kill_Solar_Power/47222/0/38/38/Y/M.html
>
>
>
> Remember, conspiracies don’t exist…..
>
The power companies have been trying to strangle solar power for years with
various machinations. They are in a tizzy in Hawaii now
The most interesting thing to me on the coldfusionnow page - announcing the
shameless Brillouin Capitol Hill supplication …
http://coldfusionnow.org/brillouin-energy-corp-hosts-information-session-on-lenr-thermal-energy-technology-at-u-s-capitol/
…was not the data-free PR event itself – but
I am going to do apps that interface with midi upon the release of Android M.
My first app is running but I still need to work on it a bit. It was a to get
the tablet to
accept data from the midi keyboard. I playing the keyboard here in the movie.
More non-musical apps that interface with MIDI c
Hi again Chris.
No, being an optimist seeing the possibilities (instead of all the
conspiracies) is the first step to correct anything wrong or ill. Almost
nothing but the game Monopoly is a zero sum game. People who believe that
it is a zero sum game are forcing that to happen. You do have another
Well this has to be testable.
And if Beta decay or some funky electric current of unclear origin, it must
be detectable and either way somehow useful.
And again which it is can be discovered.
This is very doable in a backyard manner.
What test would verify the presence of electrical energy (bet
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:20 PM, John Berry wrote:
Well this has to be testable.
>
It looks like there are ways to do this at home, including using a
home-built scintillation counter or cloud chamber:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnpNb4Plt1Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sejvogRVmZs
https:
http://fcnp.com/2015/11/10/the-peak-oil-crisis-the-next-keystone-debate/
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>> The web page does not have the quality you would expect from Apple.
>
> Don't get me wrong. I wasn't implying that it wasn't real. It would
> be wise for Apple to not show their hand.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>>> The web page does not have the quality you would expect from Apple.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong. I wasn't implying that it wasn'
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
The web page does not have the quality you would expect from Apple
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:47:22 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
The ionization energy of the alkali metals gets higher as they get smaller, ergo
they get less reactive.
>I wrote:
>
>Thermite has aluminum in it, so the above reaction for aluminum could
>> apply. That makes lithi
32 matches
Mail list logo
