(Rutherford model).
At least that’s how I understood it.
From: Jonathan Berry
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 4:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote
The latter (not covered by existing theory) because it is an aether.vortex that
moves with the toroid.
It wasn
Um…… if you tried to create a Mark’s coil, what were you feeling?
>
>
>
> A very tiny interaction with earth’s magnetic field? Or something else
> that (AFAIK) isn’t covered by existing theory?
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Berry
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2022 3:18 PM
they might move or pulse.
Oh, and read Bernardo Kastrup’s books about consciousness. He is gonzo deep.
Such as his book “Materialism Is Baloney”.
From: Jürg Wyttenbach mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 6:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com&g
wever they might move or pulse.
>
>
>
> Oh, and read Bernardo Kastrup’s books about consciousness. He is gonzo
> deep. Such as his book “Materialism Is Baloney”.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jürg Wyttenbach
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2022 6:35 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
&g
35 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote
According to the new SO(4) physics model all mass is EM mass and as a
such can go into resonance with all other EM mass. If the energies
match then an action may happen. Even more interesting is that EM
fields in fact act/resonate ins
or pulse.
Oh, and read Bernardo Kastrup’s books about consciousness. He is gonzo deep.
Such as his book “Materialism Is Baloney”.
From: Jürg Wyttenbach
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 6:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote
According to the new SO(4) physics model all
According to the new SO(4) physics model all mass is EM mass and as a
such can go into resonance with all other EM mass. If the energies match
then an action may happen. Even more interesting is that EM fields in
fact act/resonate instantaneously. Only a follow up mass like action is
limited to
Consider if there was no consciousness, matter and stars and life, but no
consciousness, it is beyond comprehension,
If something isn't seen by consciousness, does it really exist? Quantum
physics often suggests it doesn't!
After all we know that it's not just the photon, but also the electron t
Reality is a derivative of consciousness.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:48 PM H LV wrote:
> “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from
> consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk
> about, everything that we regard as existing, postulat
9 matches
Mail list logo
