Good point, Mark – since this detail is easy to overlook. I wonder how many of
the geniuses at Livermore really have understood what Holmlid is saying.
Amazingly, if we can believe it - the Holmlid work not only provides a shortcut
to achieving breakeven in laser fusion, BUT ALSO explains why
Check this out - Nature 1999FYI:
Just in passing, I would like to note (to others, at least) that this Nature
Paper is Reference [4] in Holmlid’s 2014 Paper:
Ultra-Dense Hydrogen H(−1) as the Cause of Instabilities in Laser
Compression-Based Nuclear Fusion
http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.p
Right, Bob. It looks like the dense deuterium essentially permits a
comparatively slow laser pulse to break up nucleons instead of fusing them -
which is ironic. (in more ways than one).
More from less.
The bad news is that it hasn’t been duplicated by a most interested party who
has lo
Check this out - Nature 1999It seems the 1999 experimenters thought that
neutrons were the cause or result of the reaction that was observed.
>>>“We achieve an efficiency of about 105 fusion neutrons per joule of incident
>>>laser energy, which approaches the efficiency of large-scale laser-dri
4 matches
Mail list logo
