On Nov 30, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
Thanks, Horace, good stuff. I'm busy for a while.
You are welcome. I should be busy, but I am addicted to this list.
I should be getting some new hardware in a week or so, so I'm using
that as an excuse to kill some time. 8^) Anythi
Thanks, Horace, good stuff. I'm busy for a while.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
>
>> I like his theory, it may well be the process happening. Even if it
>> isn't entirely, it provides a good starting point for fur
On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
I like his theory, it may well be the process happening. Even if it
isn't entirely, it provides a good starting point for further
research. I also very much like his notion of other systems that may
show LENR processes already. Including fail
The Widom-Larsen transmutation experiments, e.g., electon beam impinging
on copper target (slides 21-23 in Widom's presentation [*]) certainly are
verifiable/falsifiable. It would be suprising if NASA's Bushnell has not
verified them. Many other credible researchers confirm them. Is it
reasonable
I like his theory, it may well be the process happening. Even if it
isn't entirely, it provides a good starting point for further
research. I also very much like his notion of other systems that may
show LENR processes already. Including failing Li-Ion batteries,
(natural) isotope fractionation and
I mean, you're joking that vortex isn't the Internet.
On Nov 27, 2011, at 18:42, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Charles Hope wrote:
>
> Joking, yes?
>
> No, I believe Larsen is serious. It is hard to judge.
>
> - Jed
>
Charles Hope wrote:
>
> Joking, yes?
>
No, I believe Larsen is serious. It is hard to judge.
- Jed
On Nov 26, 2011, at 23:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> This is an outrage! I object! Larsen called me "the textually prolific
> Internet poster-commenter Mr. Jed Rothwell." Textual, yes. Prolific, sure.
> But I do not post on the Internet. This is a mailing list, not the Internet.
Joking, yes?
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> How dare he. Internet, my foot.
>
Just in case you were serious, the archives here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/ are most certainly on the
internet.
Ignoring conflicting commercial interests, both camps agree that Ni-LENR
works. See Allan Widom's Feb 10, 2010 Army Research Labs presentation:
"Collective Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter"
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2010/ARL/Pres/02Widom-WidomLarsenTheory.pdf
The "CONCLUS
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Lattice Energy LLC comments on Rossi
A primer for electroweak induced low-energy nuclear reactions,
Srivastava, Widom, Larsen 2010 October: Rich Murray 2011.11.26
Reedited for clarity -- also helps me integrate the many ideas...
Three ring circus !
What does Hagelstein think?
Is
A primer for electroweak induced low-energy nuclear reactions,
Srivastava, Widom, Larsen 2010 October: Rich Murray 2011.11.26
Reedited for clarity -- also helps me integrate the many ideas...
Three ring circus !
What does Hagelstein think?
Is neutron production via spark exploded wires reported b
Three ring circus !
What does Hagelstein think?
Is neutron production via spark exploded wires reported by many
independent labs?
How hard would this be for amateurs?
Could tiny experiments generate neutrons at low costs and high safety?
What would happen if a wire was embedded in a diamond an
Nice sales pitch:
http://www.ias.ac.in/pramana/v75/p617/fulltext.pdf
"The analysis presented in this paper leads us to conclude that
realistic possibilities exist for designing LENR devices capable of
producing `green energy', that is, production of excess heat at low cost
without lethal nucle
Hey Jed you got a mention:
"For example, someof the more publicly visible membersof this tactically
cohesivecore group of cold fusioneers include, in no particular order,
Dr. Edmund Storms, Prof. Peter Hagelstein, Dr. Michael McKubre, Mitchell
Swartz, M.D., Prof. David Nagel, Dr. Michael Melic
...the macrocosm (dusty plasmas and magnetic-regime astrophysical
phenomena on large length-scales), recently published in a refereed
Indian Academy of Science journal as follows (much less mathematically
intensive than our EPJC paper published in 2006):
“A primer for electroweak induced low-energy
Basically he says CF is wrong but CF is correct?
2011/11/27 Jed Rothwell
> Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
> Jed should really read this!!!
>>
>
> Yes. It is hilarious, isn't it?
>
> Now we know where Krivit gets his weird notions. (Actually, aficonados
> have known all along.)
>
> - Jed
>
>
--
Daniel
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Jed should really read this!!!
>
Yes. It is hilarious, isn't it?
Now we know where Krivit gets his weird notions. (Actually, aficonados have
known all along.)
- Jed
This is an outrage! I object! Larsen called me "the textually prolific
Internet poster-commenter Mr. Jed Rothwell." Textual, yes. Prolific, sure.
But I do *not* post on the Internet. This is a mailing list, not the
Internet.
The total text I have posted at LENR-CANR is not even as much as one colu
Jed should really read this!!!
2011/11/27
> More controversy between LENR competitors ---
>
> Lewis Larsen-Lattice Energy LLC-Comments re Mr. Andrea Rossi & E-Cat
> Technology-Nov 26 2011
>
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lewis-larsenlattice-energy-llccomments-re-mr-andrea-rossi-ecat-
More controversy between LENR competitors ---
Lewis Larsen-Lattice Energy LLC-Comments re Mr. Andrea Rossi & E-Cat
Technology-Nov 26 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lewis-larsenlattice-energy-llccomments-re-mr-andrea-rossi-ecat-technologynov-26-2011
21 matches
Mail list logo
