Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
P.J van Noorden wrote: > The waterflow was higher. During the test on january 14th one can hear a > pulsating sound. > I suspect that this is caused by a pump which infuses a certain amount of > water into the Rossi cell. > Do you know if the waterflow is continously or pulsating? > On Jan. 14

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread P.J van Noorden
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:49 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1" P.J van Noorden wrote: I find it difficult to understand that in the Rossi reactor with a flow of 6l/h =

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 04/19/2011 10:51 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > > A modern day miracle !! > > But -- not surprising as many are already treating Rossi as some kind > of Messiah figure who can do no wrong -- > Jones, who put such an angry bee in your bonnet over Rossi? You swallowed all the nonsense spewed out by

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > Your assertions make no sense. You seem to think that the e-Cat should have > melted a ton of steel. How can it do that if all of the heat is being > carried off in the form of hot water? > A nuclear reactor could probably melt a ton of steel in a few seconds, but it heats water inste

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > I.m.o with such a low flow rate the water will reach the boilingpoint > before it reaches the end of the nickel catalyst. > > > > > > Precisely ! No steam buts this into the category as divine intervention … > > > > And can you imagine – lo and behold NO steam explosion at 1

RE: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jones Beene
From: P.J van Noorden I find it difficult to understand that in the Rossi reactor with a flow of 6l/h = about 2 ml/sec and a proposed excess energy of 12 kW no vapour "explosions" are heard. I.m.o with such a low flow rate the water will reach the boilingpoint before it reaches the end of th

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
P.J van Noorden wrote: I find it difficult to understand that in the Rossi reactor with a flow of 6l/h = about 2 ml/sec and a proposed excess energy of 12 kW no vapour "explosions" are heard. Which experiment was that? You may be confused. On Jan. 14 the flow rate was 18 L/h, power ~12 kW. O

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread P.J van Noorden
al Message - From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:28 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1" I quoted: "Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which is not a surprise . .

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Esa Ruoho
I'm hoping that Jed will soon post that Rossi Quotes .doc file, instead of doing back'n'forth with Jonas :) On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Josef Karthauser wrote: > I love this group. It makes better viewing than a soap opera ;). > Joe >

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > Since the e-Cat is long and slender, I suppose the cell is also long and > slender. > That might also explain why it needs 5 heaters, where the e-Kitten needs only one. Rossi does not want to discuss the shape of the cell. I suppose that means the shape is important. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: This is hilarious and indicative of a child’s playground mentality … did > so, did not, did so … ROTFL > The message is right here: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg45088.html It says "there is at least a 1000:1 error." Maybe you did not mean that. I sugge

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Josef Karthauser
I love this group. It makes better viewing than a soap opera ;). Joe On 19 Apr 2011, at 14:58, "Jones Beene" wrote: > This is hilarious and indicative of a child’s playground mentality … did so, > did not, did so … ROTFL > > > > – you said yourself, on the advice of your so-called expert,

RE: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jones Beene
This is hilarious and indicative of a child's playground mentality . did so, did not, did so . ROTFL - you said yourself, on the advice of your so-called expert, that the 130 kW was BOGUS !! So now are you reversing direction once again, hoping to save face by using the data you already rej

Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
I quoted: > "Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which > is not a surprise . . ." > Furthermore, that appraisal was done by the authors themselves, in NyTeknik. It isn't anecdotal -- it is what they measured and reported. - Jed

[Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"

2011-04-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > This “1000 times” thing is an insane slander with no basis in fact, as are > these other silly pronouncements that you have dreamed up . . . > You said it yourself!!! Right here, 4/18/11 3:03 PM: "Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which is