P.J van Noorden wrote:
> The waterflow was higher. During the test on january 14th one can hear a
> pulsating sound.
> I suspect that this is caused by a pump which infuses a certain amount of
> water into the Rossi cell.
> Do you know if the waterflow is continously or pulsating?
>
On Jan. 14
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"
P.J van Noorden wrote:
I find it difficult to understand that in the Rossi reactor with a flow of
6l/h =
On 04/19/2011 10:51 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> A modern day miracle !!
>
> But -- not surprising as many are already treating Rossi as some kind
> of Messiah figure who can do no wrong --
>
Jones, who put such an angry bee in your bonnet over Rossi?
You swallowed all the nonsense spewed out by
I wrote:
> Your assertions make no sense. You seem to think that the e-Cat should have
> melted a ton of steel. How can it do that if all of the heat is being
> carried off in the form of hot water?
>
A nuclear reactor could probably melt a ton of steel in a few seconds, but
it heats water inste
Jones Beene wrote:
> I.m.o with such a low flow rate the water will reach the boilingpoint
> before it reaches the end of the nickel catalyst.
>
>
>
>
>
> Precisely ! No steam buts this into the category as divine intervention …
>
>
>
> And can you imagine – lo and behold NO steam explosion at 1
From: P.J van Noorden
I find it difficult to understand that in the Rossi reactor with a flow of
6l/h = about 2 ml/sec and a proposed excess energy of 12 kW no vapour
"explosions" are heard. I.m.o with such a low flow rate the water will reach
the boilingpoint before it reaches the end of th
P.J van Noorden wrote:
I find it difficult to understand that in the Rossi reactor with a
flow of 6l/h = about 2 ml/sec and a proposed excess energy of 12 kW no
vapour "explosions" are heard.
Which experiment was that? You may be confused. On Jan. 14 the flow rate
was 18 L/h, power ~12 kW. O
al Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Beene says the error is "at least 1000:1"
I quoted:
"Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which
is not a surprise . .
I'm hoping that Jed will soon post that Rossi Quotes .doc file, instead of
doing back'n'forth with Jonas :)
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> I love this group. It makes better viewing than a soap opera ;).
> Joe
>
I wrote:
> Since the e-Cat is long and slender, I suppose the cell is also long and
> slender.
>
That might also explain why it needs 5 heaters, where the e-Kitten needs
only one.
Rossi does not want to discuss the shape of the cell. I suppose that means
the shape is important.
- Jed
Jones Beene wrote:
This is hilarious and indicative of a child’s playground mentality … did
> so, did not, did so … ROTFL
>
The message is right here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg45088.html
It says "there is at least a 1000:1 error." Maybe you did not mean that. I
sugge
I love this group. It makes better viewing than a soap opera ;).
Joe
On 19 Apr 2011, at 14:58, "Jones Beene" wrote:
> This is hilarious and indicative of a child’s playground mentality … did so,
> did not, did so … ROTFL
>
>
>
> – you said yourself, on the advice of your so-called expert,
This is hilarious and indicative of a child's playground mentality . did so,
did not, did so . ROTFL
- you said yourself, on the advice of your so-called expert, that the 130 kW
was BOGUS !!
So now are you reversing direction once again, hoping to save face by using
the data you already rej
I quoted:
> "Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which
> is not a surprise . . ."
>
Furthermore, that appraisal was done by the authors themselves, in NyTeknik.
It isn't anecdotal -- it is what they measured and reported.
- Jed
Jones Beene wrote:
> This “1000 times” thing is an insane slander with no basis in fact, as are
> these other silly pronouncements that you have dreamed up . . .
>
You said it yourself!!! Right here, 4/18/11 3:03 PM:
"Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which is
15 matches
Mail list logo