[Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY No. 472

2011-09-10 Thread Peter Gluck
Friends, Please be my dear guests at the Ego Out blog and read http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/09/informavores-sunday-no-472.html I am sure you will discover some interesting and some useful things. If yes, please promote this old publication in the circles of your friends. Thank you, Peter

[Vo]:Asymmetry Reaction is the key

2011-09-10 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
In my more recent work, I am not talking about altering the Quantum Vacuum itself; rather, I am trying to alter the way matter reacts to the Quantum-flux. Granted, the expanding circle of the virtual photons as it winks-in is expanding in all directions, but it can only be pushing on a particul

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:24:14 -0400: Hi, [snip] > wrote: > > >> Over the long haul, it's going to need to come from electrolysis anyway. >> That's >> where most of our hydrogen is. It doesn't need to cause explosions if done >> correctly. > > >Of course. Over the

RE: [Vo]:Fran & Group: Please Reconsider the following pointTime-Frame-Based Casimir Effect

2011-09-10 Thread francis
Scott, I am not saying the perpendicularity prevents these virtual photons from exerting real forces - only that the forces divide equally between the 3 spatial axis unless you use another body or field that interacts with the photon in an asymmetrical manner -like tacking a sail boat to deriv

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
wrote: > Over the long haul, it's going to need to come from electrolysis anyway. > That's > where most of our hydrogen is. It doesn't need to cause explosions if done > correctly. Of course. Over the short-haul too. But it should be done at specialized facilities by experienced people. Do-it-

Re: [Vo]:The effect of cold fusion on employment

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
wrote: > >then cold fusion will reduce overall employment by 1.2 million people. > >Inexorably. > [snip] > This may well be true in the USA which already has a high standard of > living, > however CF will make a huge difference in the developing world, where > billions > of people currently can

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:44:06 -0400: Hi, [snip] > wrote: > >I don't see why they would need to store any Hydrogen. They could just >> produce >> it on demand through electrolysis. If they can't do this then the device is >> worthless anyway. >> > >It is a bad idea

RE: [Vo]:Fran & Group: Please Reconsider the following pointTime-Frame-Based Casimir Effect

2011-09-10 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
I agree that we can view virtual photons as expanding through our lower dimensional 3-di "Plane" I think of this expansion in terms of a photon "traveling" half a wavelength then disappearing. From any standpoint the Quantum Photon Flux is imparting momentum to matter (or else it doesn't matter

Re: [Vo]:I love Obama, great speach on jobs, patents too

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
wrote: > >"I get it," said Adell. "Don’t shout. When the sun is done, the other > stars > >will be gone, too." > > > This is of course not true. New stars are being born all the time. > They know that. The basic point remains valid. Read the whole story: http://filer.case.edu/dts8/thelastq.htm

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
wrote: I don't see why they would need to store any Hydrogen. They could just > produce > it on demand through electrolysis. If they can't do this then the device is > worthless anyway. > It is a bad idea to produce hydrogen on demand with electrolysis. That adds to the complexity and cost of th

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:07:55 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Peter Gluck wrote: > >> But Xanthi Press wrote no testing by State authorities no >> plant. Confusing. > >The Sept. 1 report said they do not have a license for the plant yet. >Defkalion confirmed they are still wo

Re: [Vo]:I love Obama, great speach on jobs, patents too

2011-09-10 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:09:17 -0400: Hi, [snip] >"I get it," said Adell. "Don’t shout. When the sun is done, the other stars >will be gone, too." > This is of course not true. New stars are being born all the time. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.fr

Re: [Vo]:The effect of cold fusion on employment

2011-09-10 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:27:43 -0400: Hi, [snip] >To summarize, if we decide to live more or less the way we do now, consuming >about as much energy per capita as we do now, with roughly as much >transportation, space-heating, illumination, data transmission and so

[Vo]:The effect of cold fusion on employment

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
wrote: Yes has you read Lights in a Tunnel it is shareware and goes through this. > > Would free energy mean more or less jobs, perhaps Jed knows. > When I wrote the book in 2004, in chapter 20 on employment I said that cold fusion would not have a large impact. Nearly everyone in the energy bu

Re: [Vo]:I love Obama, great speach on jobs, patents too

2011-09-10 Thread Charles Hope
One can make the case that displaced old workers can't be retrained, and so should be kept alive on transfer payments, but their children should be able to take part in the new economy, as software workers, so there should never be a permanently displaced class. Sent from my iPhone. On Sep 1

Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread Harry Veeder
Thanks for posting this. harry - Original Message - > From: Akira Shirakawa > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 2:30:53 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes > > On 2011-09-08 22:48, Alan J Fletcher wrote: > > This is interesting too: > > http://www.jou

Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes

2011-09-10 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-09-08 22:48, Alan J Fletcher wrote: This is interesting too: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=501&cpage=16#comment-70924 Andrea Rossi September 10th, 2011 at 1:20 PM WARNING TO ALL OUR READERS: I AM RECEIVING THOUSANDS OF REQUESTS OF INVITATION TO VISIT OUR PLANT. FOR OBV

Re: [Vo]:I love Obama, great speach on jobs, patents too

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > A subtle point the above premise may have gotten completely wrong is the > fact that as automation takes over more and more jobs in traditional > manufacturing sectors it is NOT necessarily true that these misplaced > workers will end up being reemplo

Re: [Vo]:I love Obama, great speach on jobs, patents too

2011-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jouni Valkonen wrote: > Actually, creating jobs is rather irrelevant goal, because it is more > important to create automation and robots who does the productive > work. Of course, creating automation, does return into innovation. > > As the wealth is acquired from automation, then it is possibl

RE: [Vo]:I love Obama, great speach on jobs, patents too

2011-09-10 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
>From Harry Veeder > >Actually, creating jobs is rather irrelevant goal, because it is more > >important to create automation and robots who does the productive > >work. Of course, creating automation, does return into innovation. > > > >As the wealth is acquired from automation, then it is