RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-26 Thread Mark . Reeder
On 26/10/2001 17:11:30 David Brodbeck wrote: > Right now one of the major benefits of VNC is that it's *small*. ;) I could have put it better but that's why I said >... - (sledgehammers and walnuts ? ) A "load diagnostics/tuning version" for when you when you want to see if there is a better w

RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-26 Thread David Brodbeck
D] Subject: RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster As end users, we are likely to assume characteristics and forget to allow for other dominating factors; with 20/20 hindsight, we could speculate about some useful automated support for this. In time, perhaps self-optimised with adaptive mechanisms - (sledgeh

RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-26 Thread Mark . Reeder
On 26/10/2001 14:42:45 David Brodbeck wrote: > The answer is "it depends". You really need to test settings and see what > works best in your situation. ... Pay particular attention to whatever you think >you'll be doing a lot > over the connection. You should be able to get an idea of what's

RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-26 Thread Bendotti, Gerard
files and so on. Gerard Bendotti > -Original Message- > From: David Brodbeck [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:43 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster > > The answer is "it depends".

RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-26 Thread David Brodbeck
The answer is "it depends". You really need to test settings and see what works best in your situation. For example, over a modem link, "Tight" compression is much faster than "Hextile". But over Ethernet it's noticably slower -- the extra compression overhead causes more of a delay than just s

RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-25 Thread Shawn Clabough
hat the server-side display is like (complex graphics, plain > background, etc). From Const's notes, it appears jpeg compression is > designed to be used when the server side has more complex graphics. > > -Original Message- > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:54 PM &

RE: jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-25 Thread Glenn Mabbutt
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jpeg or 8-bit faster Which is faster, jpeg (level 9 compression and 0 quality) or 8-bit? kShawn - To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsub

jpeg or 8-bit faster

2001-10-25 Thread Shawn Clabough
Which is faster, jpeg (level 9 compression and 0 quality) or 8-bit? kShawn - To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.h