OOPS! I missed that part of the readme. Once again, my fingers got
ahead of my brain
I guess that's the "cut down" version of X that Xvnc is based on...
Anyway, I just installed XF86 4.1.0 so everything should be fine.
Perhaps a line in the readme warning against make install might be
app
Hello Yan,
YS> the TightVNC distrib clearly made an Xwrapper. Make install then
YS> overwrote the original distrib's Xwrapper.
YS> Should I have not run make install? Or did I screw something up in
YS> the make process?
Oh, now I see the problem, sorry I have not noticed it earlier. The
recomme
Well, after I ran make install, I ended up with:
[yan@hamlet Xserver]$ ls -l `locate Xwrapper`
-rws--x--x1 root root15624 Jul 22 12:44
/usr/X11R6/bin/Xwrapper
-rwxrwxr-x1 root root15624 Jul 22 06:37
/usr/src/vnc/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc/programs/Xserver/Xwrapper
[yan@ham
Hello,
> "YS" == Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
YS> Turns out that tight-vnc (and I assume vnc as well) installs a new
YS> copy of Xwrapper that tries to run /usr/X11R6/bin/X.
Oh no, it does not do that (neither standard VNC nor TightVNC). And I
have no idea why should it need to re
I have two systems. Both are running Red Hat 7.0; one has Xfree 4.0.3
and the other 4.0.1.
I got the latest copy of tight-vnc source and compiled it with no
problems. Then I installed it. Again, no problem - until I tried to
re-start X. X would not start.
Turns out that tight-vnc (and I assu
