True, but that adds another layer of indirection. AutoCAD is slow and
memory-hungry enough running natively. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Piotr Zielenkiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 2:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David Brodbeck wrote:
> > But there are a few areas that are lacking.
> >
>
> > - CAD software. The company I work for utterly relies on AutoCAD. There's
> > no version of
>
> It really depends on what kind of cad work you want to do, but I found
Of course, but when an app needs two seperate File menus with completely
different entries, something is wrong. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage
David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> Well, first let me state that I'm not talking about ease of installation
> here. On a workstation OS, I don't care if individual users can install
> drivers or new software. (In fact, it makes my life easier if they can't.
> ;) ) And if anything Linux would be less ha
Well, first let me state that I'm not talking about ease of installation
here. On a workstation OS, I don't care if individual users can install
drivers or new software. (In fact, it makes my life easier if they can't.
;) ) And if anything Linux would be less hardware dependent than NT -- I
cou
