Re: TridiaVNC v. ATT VNC - Win 9x

2001-02-03 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote: > As I've mentioned before, much of TridiaVNC's bulk is accounted for by > their special installer and associated Java VM. I'm fairly sure a > binary-packaged installer would be much smaller and simpler. Yes, but since that's not presently an option, I

Re: TridiaVNC v. ATT VNC - Win 9x

2001-02-03 Thread Jonathan Morton
>I don't know if there's a hard and fast rule. The major tradeoffs are size >and speed. The TridiaVNC distro is about 7-11 MB, whereas the binaries >from AT&T are about 1 MB. So, obviously the AT&T binaries are faster to >download and install on a slow link, but will not offer the same native >com

Re: TridiaVNC v. ATT VNC - Win 9x

2001-02-03 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
I don't know if there's a hard and fast rule. The major tradeoffs are size and speed. The TridiaVNC distro is about 7-11 MB, whereas the binaries from AT&T are about 1 MB. So, obviously the AT&T binaries are faster to download and install on a slow link, but will not offer the same native compress

TridiaVNC v. ATT VNC - Win 9x

2001-02-02 Thread wpascanrec
Comments on the difference(s) and/or benefits of using Tridia VNC v. ATT VNC. Setup would be: Location A has a 64K 1B ISDN Link - NetGear RH348 Location B has a 56K Dial up moving to Cable - NetGear RM356 at this time.going to SMC Barricade &