RE: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-02 Thread Walter.Kwaan
Server -- Comments |more importantly, you must be running a WIN32 client to use w2k term |services. | |no java client is available, no mac, no linux, no unix clients... Not true, w2k clients exist for unix (rdesktop) http://rdesktop.tuxia.org/rwin-1.4.0.tar.gz or you can use the rdp2vnc on your

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread John Roland Elliott
iginal Message - From: "Peters, A John (MN27)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Terminal Server -- Comments > Every Terminal Server client connection must have a license for a verion of > Windows NT (XP

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread John Roland Elliott
- Original Message - From: "Walter.Kwaan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: RE: Terminal Server -- Comments > more importantly, you must be running a WIN32 client to use w2k term > services. > &g

RE: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread De Vos Rudi
|more importantly, you must be running a WIN32 client to use w2k term |services. | |no java client is available, no mac, no linux, no unix clients... Not true, w2k clients exist for unix (rdesktop) http://rdesktop.tuxia.org/rwin-1.4.0.tar.gz or you can use the rdp2vnc on your w2k or unix box an

RE: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread Peters, A John (MN27)
ovember 01, 2001 8:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminal Server -- Comments First, unlike the NT version, which is a separate product (Windows NT Server Terminal Server Edition), and unlike Citrix Metaframe, which is an add-on to Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Server (and Advanced S

RE: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread Walter.Kwaan
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminal Server -- Comments First, unlike the NT version, which is a separate product (Windows NT Server Terminal Server Edition), and unlike Citrix Metaframe, which is an add-on to Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Server (and Advanced Server, and Enterprise Server

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread John Roland Elliott
From: "Justin Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:30 AM Subject: Re: Terminal Server -- Comments > This sounds good, but forgive me, I have very little knowledge of the M$ server > products/Liscensing Scams. I would need

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread C.Lee Taylor
Justin Bennett wrote: > This sounds good, but forgive me, I have very little knowledge of the M$ server > products/Liscensing Scams. I would need NT Terminal server, Does 2000 Advanced server > have the Terminal Server stuff, or is it a seperate product. I can't use The 2000 > Professional (deskt

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-11-01 Thread Justin Bennett
This sounds good, but forgive me, I have very little knowledge of the M$ server products/Liscensing Scams. I would need NT Terminal server, Does 2000 Advanced server have the Terminal Server stuff, or is it a seperate product. I can't use The 2000 Professional (desktop) product or NT 4.0 server? W

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-10-31 Thread C.Lee Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Interesting, but i think he was looking to do this > with out terminal services.. which i think is pretty > much impossible unless someone writes a 'free' winframe > type program... Well, there is a program called rdesktop on freshmeat.net. This will let you

Re: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-10-31 Thread Justin Bennett
Basically what I am trying to do is replace some of my windows desktops with linux boxes, however our companies ERP package is Oracle Forms and the version of the forms runtime we are running doesn't exist for linux (as far as I can find). If I was able to send the display back from a Windows

RE: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-10-31 Thread Glenn Mabbutt
ia the list archives. Glenn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Terminal Server -- Comments Interesting, but i think he was looking to do this with out terminal services.. which i

RE: Terminal Server -- Comments

2001-10-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting, but i think he was looking to do this with out terminal services.. which i think is pretty much impossible unless someone writes a 'free' winframe type program... Plus read your licenses for 2000pro/XPpro, they prohibit that sort of multi-user thing anyway, if it exists/was written..