At 04:30 PM 3/15/01 -0800, you wrote:
>AuthHosts filter now behaves correctly. I wonder will this now work like
>entering this 192.168.1.1, but matching 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.10, and 100
>or just .1? I wish I could enter masking too like 192.168.1.64/26 (26 =
>255.255.255.192 right?). This may no
The 3.3.3r8 Windows binary zipfile on the website should now have the
correct version of vncviewer, which is 3.3.3R3, not R2a. The source package
always had this version.
I'm sure people will let us know of any other problems :-)
Cheers
Tristan
-
"James
- Original Message -
From: "Freddy Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: Windows VNC package updated to 3.3.3r8
> I didn't see any response to the question about
el : 766513
AT&T Labs Cambridge, UK - Tel : 343000
- Original Message -
From: "Freddy Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: Windows VNC package upd
I didn't see any response to the question about the
viewer version. The old viewer version is 3.3.3 R2
and the new version is 3.3.3 R2a.
Should we stick with the old version or use the new
one?
Thanks
Freddy
-
To unsubscribe,
AuthHosts filter now behaves correctly. I wonder will this now work like
entering this 192.168.1.1, but matching 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.10, and 100
or just .1? I wish I could enter masking too like 192.168.1.64/26 (26 =
255.255.255.192 right?). This may not be a big deal, but I like to put
securit
A minor nit?
The previous Win32 vncclient reports 3.3.3R3.
This new version reports 3.3.3R2a.
FYI.
Raye.
> AT&T Laboratories Cambridge is pleased to announce release 3.3.3r8 of the
> Windows VNC package.
>
> This release has some important bug fixes to the WinVNC server, plus some
> minor en
