Re: RFBProxy Win32

2001-05-11 Thread Tim Waugh
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:13:03PM +0200, Francis VIVAT wrote: > So it should be better with : rfbproxy --server=:0 --record c:\123.log > But it doesn't work neither. > I should conclude that it doesn't work, but if you tell it everything : > rfbproxy --server=localhost:0 --record c:\123.log > it

Re: RFBProxy Win32

2001-05-02 Thread Tim Waugh
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:13:03PM +0200, Francis VIVAT wrote: > So it should be better with : rfbproxy --server=:0 --record c:\123.log > But it doesn't work neither. > I should conclude that it doesn't work, but if you tell it everything : > rfbproxy --server=localhost:0 --record c:\123.log > it

Re: RFBProxy Win32

2001-04-25 Thread Francis VIVAT
inal Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: mercredi 25 avril 2001 12:01 Subject: RFBProxy Win32 > I have tried your CGYWIN port of rfbproxy, and have a error. I will > undertstand if your compile is unsupported!!! > > My problem i