On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:47:45PM +0200, Allan Gee wrote:
> Thus it would seem that the Apache server does not know where the java files
> live. Do you know how I get over this?
It isn't apache that's doing the web serving; it's Xvnc. Check out
the -http* options.
Tim.
*/
[demime 0.97b remov
]
Subject: Re: rfbProcessClientProtocolVersion: not a valid RFB client
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:21:16PM +0200, Allan Gee wrote:
> I am (trying) to use the vncviewer via the browser (IE5) and when I do I
Do you get better results with the non-Java viewer (vncviewer.exe)?
Tim.
*/
[demime 0.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:21:16PM +0200, Allan Gee wrote:
> I am (trying) to use the vncviewer via the browser (IE5) and when I do I
Do you get better results with the non-Java viewer (vncviewer.exe)?
Tim.
*/
[demime 0.97b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
-
n
021 4181777
082 6513355
-Original Message-
From: Tim Waugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rfbProcessClientProtocolVersion: not a valid RFB client
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Allan Gee wrote:
>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Allan Gee wrote:
> 29/11/00 11:10:02 Got connection from client 192.168.178.14
> 29/11/00 11:10:02 rfbProcessClientProtocolVersion: not a valid RFB client
> 29/11/00 11:10:02 Client 192.168.178.14 gone
telnet _isn't_ a valid RFB client. Why not use a VN
