> From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Is there a good reason NT authentication couldn't be added to
> the Windows NT
> VNC server? This seems like a pretty good idea.
in their FAQs they say it's not implemented because of VNC's multiplatform
design.
--
Daniel
-
At 08:50 AM 2001-06-27 -0400, you wrote:
>Is there a good reason NT authentication couldn't be added to the Windows NT
>VNC server? This seems like a pretty good idea.
See http://www.rabidpenguin.org/diversions.html by Jared Smolens. There you
will find the WinVNC NT Auth Patches to 3.3.2R6. Au
Is there a good reason NT authentication couldn't be added to the Windows NT
VNC server? This seems like a pretty good idea.
-Original Message-
From: Varga Daniel (QI/RZS4) * [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> From: David Howe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> The only real advantage PC_Anywhere has is encryption by default - and
> that is via a propriatory alg that isn't known to be secure (try SSH
> forwarding instead - at least you know you can trust that)
other advantage of PCAnywhere: you can use NT
> Although I think that VNC is a really good little application
> I think I may go with PC anywhere as I do not know very much
> about security and so on so I would not want to have to set
> up VNC and worry about SSH and so on. I assume that as PC
> Anywhere is sold by a big company to the masse
