18, 2002 8:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
Sorry, bad reading, I ment the client software, don't know about the
server
side, however roumors go there is a lot of bsd code in Micro$oft
distributions...
CBee
> -Original
Actually they are not... Only the standard bits.. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex K.
Angelopoulos
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
Their own
gelopoulos
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
According to their interpretation, pcAnywhere, CarbonCopy, and
NetSupport,
and even Microsoft's own Telnet server distributed as a built-in
component
of XP)
2 3:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
>
>
> Their own implementation of a telnet server, which does
> differ from other
> implementations. Do you mean that the telnet server on
> Win2K/XP and the FTP
> server
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2002-03-18 07:23
Subject: RE: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
: > -Original Message-
: > Subject: Re: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
: >
: >
: > According to their interpreta
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: Another beatup on XP and !VNC EULA on slashdot
>
>
> According to their interpretation, pcAnywhere, CarbonCopy,
> and NetSupport,
> and even Microsoft's own Telnet server distributed as a
> built-in component
> of XP)
According to their interpretation, pcAnywhere, CarbonCopy, and NetSupport,
and even Microsoft's own Telnet server distributed as a built-in component
of XP) are prohibited on XP...
Entertainment value, perhaps?
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew van der Stock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
