> "GB" == Greg Breland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GB> Wow, you now have binaries for Linux as well as Windows.
GB> Question:
GB> I downloaded(1.1p9) the source, compiled and started up a
GB> Linux TightVNC server. I downloaded the Win32 client
GB> binary(1.1p8c). When
Wow, you now have binaries for Linux as well as Windows.
Question:
I downloaded(1.1p9) the source, compiled and started up a Linux TightVNC
server. I downloaded the Win32 client binary(1.1p8c). When using this
client against the newer server, none of the tight features seem to work.
No m
> "JH" == James Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> The only complaint I can post is that I could only find
JH> TightVNC on a russian site.. roughly 400k took me well over an
JH> hour (more like an hour and a half) to download over that
JH> connection.
The primary download s
>I also have a question about vnc's protocol tho.. when it handles text..
>does it just send it like anything else... or is there some kind of OCR
>ability there? And if it isn't OCR... Why not? Fonts on a computer should be
>able to easily be ocr'd.. or maybe there's a hack that will let windows
27;t work?
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Evan Perdicaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:45 AM
Subject: Feedback on latest TightVNC
> After downloading and compiling the source we have been using
>it for a
After downloading and compiling the source we have been using
it for a few days. For our application the speed is about twice the
previous version and several times the speed of other versions of
VNC.
So far all is stable and CPU load appears as zero, both on the
