Hello Darrell, Adam,
> DRC wrote:
>> Unfortunately I don't think we can extend the Tight encoding. You
>> should discuss this change with Constantin.
>>
> I'm not sure I understand how this works. Can someone enlighten me as
> to how RFB extensions are registered and conflicts are avoided
Hello Adam,
> Adam Tkac wrote:
> AFAIK the Tight encoding is a mechanism to encapsulate other
> encodings thus you end with something like a "protocol inside
> protocol" (The Tight encoding already has many sub-encodings like
> FTP-like transfer related encodings and the JPEG encoding as you
