Thank you for your answers.
This certainly clears up the subject.
I had this answer in the back of my mind but was not too sure of it.
Thanks again.
Francois
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http:/
Hi Noriaki-san,
I've had encoding number 17 allocated to Hitachi ZYWRLE - using this
encoding number will ensure compatibility with standard VNC and
VNC-compatible releases. The next release of the VNC codebase will
therefore include an encoding "place-holder":
const int encoding3rdPartyHitach
I am trying to set up and compile VNC client on a FC6 system with target Linux
on an ARM 9 based system.
I have installed gnuarm-4.0.2 crosscompiler.
When running configure --target=arm --prefix=/arm/common
--exec-prefix=/arm/bin
This is the not so encouraging result
creating cache ./config.cache
c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I created a shortcut - called "FORCED RESTART NOW" located on my
>> desktop.
>>
>> %windir%\system32\shutdown.exe -r -f -t 0
>>
>
> Interesting Neal...but how do you launch it?.. Telnet?..
>
How about putting it in a scheduled task? I do this in one of m
Why not patch against both? The UltraVNC and TightVNC flavors are just as
popular as RealVNC. Why limit yourself to just one version of VNC?
Steve Bostedor
Bozteck Solutions
http://www.bozteck.com
--
Take control of your net
Hi Steve,
As I pointed out in my original response, the problem with them having
patched against the UltraVNC hobby project is that that's not
VNC-compatible. Better to product patches against something VNC-compatible,
or, better still, the standard VNC codebase, if you want people to be able
to
Hi Bengt,
I'm afraid I can't remember the details offhand, but I suspect that the
cross-compilation is the problem - configure is trying to run an executable
to test for something, but it won't be able to, since of course the ARM
executable won't run on FC6. If I remember correctly, there'll be s
James and everyone else,
I agree that it's not RealVNC 4.x brand compatible but it is VNC compatible
in the sense that it is using a VNC protocol and works with any VNC that is
not the RealVNC brand 4.x base. That's like saying that it's not Microsoft
Windows compatible unless it runs on Windows
Hello all!
Has anyone done a silent uninstall of the Free Edition VNC? Also, what are the
switches for installing VNC silently? I think I got them but just wanted to
make sure. Thanks!
-
John Fabian Ceballos
Security Systems Administrator
TRW Automotive
4505 W. 26 Mile Rd
Washington, MI 480
Steve,
You've both missed the point and are unfortunately mistaken.
It's not a question of "branding", it's a question of protocol
compatibility. The UltraVNC project does not retain compatibility with
the RFB protocol, which is why it isn't compatible with standard VNC
releases. By contrast
James,
Let me start by pointing to a survey that I have on the Bozteck website.
http://www.vncscan.com/vs/asppollx/results.asp
It shows that UltraVNC and TightVNC are installed on far more systems than
RealVNC. They should not be downplayed as just hobby projects with this
much of the user base
Steve,
The other issues (which I don't particularly have an opinion on
either way), I think your original post may have missed the mark just a
bit. My reading of the thread was as follows:
1) The gentleman from Hitachi posted a patch for UltraVNC to the RealVNC
mailing list, asking that i
How specifically does UltraVNC fail to maintain compatibility with
the RFB protocol? From my perspective, it's a VNC server - my users
connect to it using my client (Chicken of the VNC) and they file
compatibility bug reports on my client when issues crop up relating
to UltraVNC. Walks l
On 2/3/07, Kelly F. Hickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I might be wrong, but that's the way I read it
I think the issue is bigger than that. You see, James addresses these as
"side"/"minor"/"hobby" projects, while as said:
They ARE 100% compatible with the original VNC code base and larg
> "Steve" == Steve Bostedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> James, Let me start by pointing to a survey that I have on
Steve> the Bozteck website.
Steve> http://www.vncscan.com/vs/asppollx/results.asp
Steve> It shows that UltraVNC and TightVNC are installed on far
Steve
15 matches
Mail list logo
