RE: RealVNC 4.1.2 does not work with MacOS 10.4.8

2006-10-20 Thread James Weatherall
Alex, While you can do that, it's obviously only useful if you want to run X11 applications, not standard Mac applications. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Pelts > Sent: 19 October 2006 21:58 > To

RE: RealVNC 4.1.2 does not work with MacOS 10.4.8

2006-10-20 Thread James Weatherall
Hi Freddy, OSXvnc is based on our old VNC 3 system and appears to, like the VNC 4 system, have been developed to remain compatible with VNC 3. Regards, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freddy Jensen > Sent: 19 O

RE: I have Desktop/Font resolution issues it seems

2006-10-20 Thread Huerta, Jose
Has anyone seen this issue with fonts before? Jose Huerta United Stationers Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office Phone: 847-627-2067 Cell Phone: 847-878-4961 Fax: 847-627-7067 From: Huerta, Jose Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:20 PM To: vnc-list@realvnc.c

Driver not support Planar/chunky

2006-10-20 Thread Caleb Cushing
I'm trying to get a vnc server (tight vnc) installed on a customer's machine so we can remote administer it. I am attempting to have the customer install it as we are a good distance from the customer. when I attempt to connect, the customer reports an error message popping up on their machine. it

Re: RealVNC 4.1.2 does not work with MacOS 10.4.8

2006-10-20 Thread Alex Pelts
James, That is true. I did not think of that. I am not a mac person, but I thought they use some sort of X server as a foundation for UI. I guess not. Regards, Alex James Weatherall wrote: Alex, While you can do that, it's obviously only useful if you want to run X11 applications, not stand

RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer

2006-10-20 Thread John Lumby
James Weatherall wrote John, No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer (host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are: Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise) and Host::port(always port) i.e. you specify *either* a VNC display

Is anyone using VNCSERVER on AIX?

2006-10-20 Thread Huerta, Jose
Has anyone installed and is using VNCSERVER on AIX? Jose Huerta United Stationers Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office Phone: 847-627-2067 Cell Phone: 847-878-4961 Fax: 847-627-7067 ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself fr

RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer

2006-10-20 Thread Kumar, Siva
John, >> vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918:19 ::4918:abcd" or even "::4918abcd"; it works. It makes sense because you cannot have more than 1 display listening on a single port (the second Xvnc will complain that it cannot bind to the given port) unless using inetd. -siva. -

Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer

2006-10-20 Thread Robin Hill
On Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 04:32:37PM -0400, John Lumby wrote: > James Weatherall wrote > > >John, > > > >No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer > >(host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are: > > > >Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise) >

RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer

2006-10-20 Thread James Weatherall
John, I'm afraid that you are mistaken. In the example you give, either ::4918 Or :4918 Are valid, and will work. ::4918:19 is not a valid server specification but happens to work because of the way VNC Viewer interprets the port/display number specification. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. >

RE: Driver not support Planar/chunky

2006-10-20 Thread James Weatherall
Caleb, TightVNC is based on the old VNC 3 codebase, which required "chunky" pixels. If you upgrade the server to VNC 4, you shouldn't see this issue. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caleb Cushing > Se