Nope,
I don't think it's due to be added either.
Jim.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 August 2005 04:25
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: sound
Can RealVNC server export sound to its clients, as well?
__
I am using Redhat distributed version of RealVNC with a Linux Cadence EDA
application that makes heavy use of Shift or Ctrl combined with mouse
dragging operations to do
different types of selections. I seem to be having some kind of modifier
problem with VNC.
If I hold the left mouse key down
I am using a Cadence application with Redhat distributed version of
RealVNC. I am having a problem with especially waveform windows but also
other Cadence apps where updates are not happening.
If for example I do a check and Save in Cadence composer and new errors are
detected in the schematic l
I have seen mention of MPEG as a pixel encoder for VNC, but
have not found any implementations.
It would seem that MPEG type encoding would be more
efficient than JPEG as MPEG counts for unchanged areas
where JPEG doesn't maintain any history of the previous
frame.
Does anybody see or know of a r
Possibly no royalty-free implementation of MPEG? Dunno if that's the case,
just speculating.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Shane Walton
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 1:44 PM
To: vnc-list
Subject: MPEG Pixel Encoder
I have seen mention of
Hi,
Is there any way to redirect a print to my local machine when I'm connected to
a remote PC.
i.e. the data comes from the remote system but prints out on my local printer.
Thanks,
Bruce
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yo
Just an FYI...
If the remote machine is Windows XP, you can use Remote Desktop or
Remote Assistance. Both local sounds and local printing are supported.
Ordway, Bruce wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to redirect a print to my local machine when I'm connected to
a remote PC.
i.e. the data comes
The MPEG encoding scheme is "lossy", whereas VNC is not.
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane Walton
> Sent: 04 August 2005 18:44
> To: vnc-list
> Subject: MPEG Pixel Encoder
>
>
> I have seen mention
Thanks for your reply.
I guess that is a good reason if no loss is a requirement.
Yet, the tight/jpeg algorithm has been incorporated into
most VNC products, and most JPEG implementations are far
from lossless, so I guess there is a market for lossy as
well.
The reason for entertaining this idea
