On Mon Oct 20, 2008 at 09:26:31PM +0200, Frangois CHAUSSON wrote:
> dear Robin
>
> Thank you for your kind help.
>
> Would you have any specific info / idea about a
> new Vista release which would fill up my need?
>
I've no idea what the future plans are for RealVNC releases. A quick
search on
dear Robin
Thank you for your kind help.
Would you have any specific info / idea about a
new Vista release which would fill up my need?
Bien cordialement.
Frangois CHAUSSON
tiliphone: 06 86 67 96 74
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
site Web: www.fchausson.net
Fax:09 55
On Mon Oct 20, 2008 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Frangois CHAUSSON wrote:
> hello
>
> I had a VNC access running between my own PC
> (Viewer) up to a remote Internet connected PC
> (Server) which was working very fluently.
>
> The remote PC had to be replaced by a new one,
> run
hello
I had a VNC access running between my own PC
(Viewer) up to a remote Internet connected PC
(Server) which was working very fluently.
The remote PC had to be replaced by a new one,
running Vista these days; I rebuilt the whole VNC
Server world into this new PC ( as a service,
port 5900
Behalf Of Yeo, Siow-Long
> Sent: 25 October 2006 08:10
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: VNC access problem
>
> The server is running on Windows 2000 and installed with VNC software.
> The VNC server has been configured but I am having some problem while
> connecting to it rem
tom: I cannot access the server via VNC if it is not login locally.
The VNC authentication will fail.
Question: What are the settings to be configured in Wndows 2000 or VNC
to allow VNC access at all times?
Thanks.
YSL
This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following disc
, but the next moment, when tried
to dial in and connect to VNC, keep getting "Unable to connect to host:
Connection refused (10061)" message.
Anyone knows what's wrong?
From: Jim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
CC: Lay Khim Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Hi Kim Tan
Ask your colleague close to the server to look in the server
options (r-click the VNC tray icon >> options)
Look at the Inputs tab.
Are the top 2 items about "...events from clients" ticked?
They should be.
jim
Lay Khim Tan wrote:
Hi,
I am currently encountering problem in taking o
Hi,
I am currently encountering problem in taking over remote control of server,
I could only see the server screen, but not able to control the server using
mouse and keyboard. But colleague close to the server is able to do that.
Why is that so? Is there someting wrong with the setting wh
Hi people,
When I attempt to access a Windows 2003 Server running VNC server
using a Mac OS X I get the following error:
java.lang.NullPointerException
I have tried both Netscape and IE with the same results.
I will ask for password, but return this error.
Any ideas?
Thankyou
_
rameshkumar wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Currently in Windows, the VNC server icon in the sys tray color is
>getting changed, when it is been accessed remotely. We would like to
>show more visible indicator to the user during remote access
>in-progress.
>
>We don't want to enable option "Prompt local user
Hi All,
Currently in Windows, the VNC server icon in the sys tray color is
getting changed, when it is been accessed remotely. We would like to
show more visible indicator to the user during remote access
in-progress.
We don't want to enable option "Prompt local user to accept incoming
connect
's unfortunate, but if Microsoft is committed to leaving JVM from its XP
> installs, it's going to have an impact on the appeal of VNC by the masses.
>
> Stephan.
>
> >
> > > -Message d'origine-
> > > De : Stephan A. Edelman [mailto:[EMAIL PR
sses.
Stephan.
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Stephan A. Edelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyi : mercredi 7 avril 2004 15:07
> > @ : Seak, Teng-Fong
> > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : Re: Web-based VNC access
> >
> >
> &
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Seak, Teng-Fong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Web-based VNC access
> Stephan A. Edelman wrote:
>
> > Let me explain where I'm coming from. We're combining VNC w
> - Could be integrated in a third-party application
> - Works faster then the java one
> - It's based on a TightVNC viewer, but includes UltraVNC NTLM
> login, screen stretching, PROXY/SOCKS support, few more goodies
Yury,
Your site should probably make it clear that the ViewerX software is
dis
d
ActiveX may provide this for us.
How transparent will you have it? If you put `vncviewer` in the path, then you
can use it at every host, even a M$-os.
Stephan.
- Original Message -
From: "Seak, Teng-Fong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednes
Stephan A. Edelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyi : mercredi 7 avril 2004 15:07
> @ : Seak, Teng-Fong
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Web-based VNC access
>
>
> Let me explain where I'm coming from. We're combining VNC with our Dynamic
> DNS software a
Seak, Teng-Fong said:
> I'm not subscribed to Washington Post.
Neither am I. Wonder why it works from Slashdot... Try this one:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/03/1430213
> I'm not so willing to subscribe
> to it because my mailbox is flooded already by spams. Is it possible to
credi 7 avril 2004 14:53
> @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Web-based VNC access
>
> Stephan A. Edelman said:
> > I welcome the availability of an ActiveX control for two reasons: (1) The
> > reality is that Java is becoming less accessible due to the fact that
> > Micros
.
- Original Message -
From: "Seak, Teng-Fong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:40 AM
Subject: RE: Web-based VNC access
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Stephan A. Edelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Hooper
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Web-based VNC access
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Hello fellow VNC users,
> > I&
Stephan A. Edelman said:
> I welcome the availability of an ActiveX control for two reasons: (1) The
> reality is that Java is becoming less accessible due to the fact that
> Microsoft has decided to remove it from its browser.
If indeed they leave it out, but I doubt they will.
http://www.washing
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Stephan A. Edelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyi : mercredi 7 avril 2004 14:05
> @ : Seak, Teng-Fong; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Web-based VNC access
>
> I welcome the availability of an ActiveX control for two reasons: (1)
Stephan A. Edelman wrote:
I welcome the availability of an ActiveX control for two reasons: (1) The
reality is that Java is becoming less accessible due to the fact that
Microsoft has decided to remove it from its browser.
This realy starts a war...
You at least have the possibility to install java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hello fellow VNC users,
> I'm glad to let you know that today we have released a simple, but yet
> useful web based VNC access.
> Basically this is a web page, which hosts our VNC ActiveX control,
[snip]
What advantage does this provide over the Java vie
- Original Message -
From: "Seak, Teng-Fong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:42 AM
Subject: RE: Web-based VNC access
> ActiveX? That means it can only be displayed on IE and only on Windows
platforms. Sorry to tel
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyi : mercredi 7 avril 2004 08:05
> @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Web-based VNC access
>
> Hello fellow VNC users,
> I'm glad to let you know that today we have released a simple, but yet
> useful web based VNC access.
> Basically this is
Hello fellow VNC users,
I'm glad to let you know that today we have released a simple, but yet
useful web based VNC access.
Basically this is a web page, which hosts our VNC ActiveX control, and
allows you to access your VNC server from a browser window.
Currently this feature is availabl
Thank you for your response. I will check my router
manual to see if it is doing anything fishy.
One other thing I forgot to mention is that when I go
to www.gotomyvnc.com, it says that my computer
65.68.xxx.xxx is ready to accept connections on
Display 0, which makes me think that my router is
The first thought that comes to mind is;
"Port Forwarding" (at the router, that is)
Is your router blocking 5900? ("Deny all, allow as required"?)
That's my $0.02 worth anyway.
Greetings from the Netherlands
-Colin
--
Colin J. Raven
+> 1. I have 1-static IP address from the telephone
+> company
VNCers,
I have seen this question being popped several times
and some suggestions made, but the solution is not
clear to me. It seems like I have done all that was
suggested in the postings that I saw (may be I am
missing some thing). This is what I have,
1. I have 1-static IP address from the t
> She would need to connect her machine and start the server, and tell you
> by
> some means the IP number of her machine, which on dialup and some other
> kinds
> of connection can change each time the connection is made.
One solution to that problem is http://www.dyndns.org
or http://www.dynd
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:14:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have installed VNC on my comp. at home and on my daughters comp. at home.
> How do I access her PC from my house? I have no firewalls, I would be
> connecting with her over the net. Please Help.
She would need to connect her
I have installed VNC on my comp. at home and on my daughters comp. at home.
How do I access her PC from my house? I have no firewalls, I would be
connecting with her over the net. Please Help.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Jim
___
VNC-List mailing
35 matches
Mail list logo
