Mike Miller wrote:
A friend sent me a message (not to this list), which is appended below.
He claims that Windows Terminal Services will do for me what VNC does, but
Terminal Services runs much faster. I'm wondering if he is correct. I
think he's wrong about bmp encoding, for one, but is any of
> Other serious limitations of Terminal services include:
> *) The server only works on NT,2k and XP nothing else not even 98.
>
> *) Licenses. The client must be using the same version of Windows as
> the machine you are connecting to, if not it'll work for 90 days
> then crash unti
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Robert de Bath wrote:
> Other serious limitations of Terminal services include:
> *) Licenses. The client must be using the same version of Windows as
> the machine you are connecting to, if not it'll work for 90 days
> then crash until you cough up the price of a
gt; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 02:10:21 -0600 (CST)
> From: Mike Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: VNC List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Terminal Services v. VNC
>
> A friend sent me a message (not to this list), which is appended
below.
> He claims that Windows Termina
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Mike Miller wrote:
> A friend sent me a message (not to this list), which is appended below.
> He claims that Windows Terminal Services will do for me what VNC does, but
> Terminal Services runs much faster. I'm wondering if he is correct. I
> think he's wrong about bmp encod
A friend sent me a message (not to this list), which is appended below.
He claims that Windows Terminal Services will do for me what VNC does, but
Terminal Services runs much faster. I'm wondering if he is correct. I
think he's wrong about bmp encoding, for one, but is any of it correct?
Thanks
