vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com] On
Behalf Of Philip Herlihy
Sent: 18 May 2009 20:24
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Something else I found: Try this in a command prompt (XP SP1+):
Netsh firewall show icmpsetting
Nets
rlihy [mailto:phi...@herlihy.eu.com]
Sent: 18 May 2009 20:11
To: 'vnc-list@realvnc.com'
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Thanks to John, and James, for very interesting pointers.
I'll experiment on the affected systems and see what I can demonstrate, but
I'd like som
t-boun...@realvnc.com] On
Behalf Of John Serink
Sent: 15 May 2009 01:37
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: Indirect connection works better
You have an MTU issue.
If you have access to the router/gateway you need to put a tcp mssadjust
command in the outgoing interface, usually eth0 or s
; From: vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Sent: Fri May 15 02:34:03 2009
> Subject: Indirect connection works better
>
> Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the
> past. I'm
> trying to connect to a machine running VNC
machine
giving you problems.
Cheers,
John
- Original Message -
From: vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Sent: Fri May 15 02:34:03 2009
Subject: Indirect connection works better
Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the past. I'm
trying to co
lvnc.com] On Behalf Of Philip Herlihy
> Sent: 14 May 2009 17:09
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
>
> Thanks, Wez - however, in response to guidance you gave me once before
> I
> already have that setting enabled.
>
> What puzzles
vnc.com
Cc: dean.eshel...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
I find this interesting. I have seen this issue and did not know how to fix
it. I do now.
The other issue I have seen is the screen saver stays on and the page does
not refresh after connect. I have found adjusting
[mailto:j...@realvnc.com]
Sent: 14 May 2009 17:24
To: 'Philip Herlihy'; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Hi Philip,
Sorry to hear that. The difference you've highlighted is that the "target"
machine is on Wi-Fi, not cable, which can cause
ot; option fixes this as well.
Dale
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, James Weatherall wrote:
> From: James Weatherall
> Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
> To: "'Philip Herlihy'" , vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 10:20 AM
> Hi Philip,
-boun...@realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com] On
Behalf Of James Weatherall
Sent: 14 May 2009 16:21
To: 'Philip Herlihy'; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Hi Philip,
Some Wi-Fi routers have trouble handling large numbers of small network
p
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: Indirect connection works better
>
> Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the past.
> I'm
> trying to connect to a machine running VNC Free edition in an office.
> I can
> make the connection (having set up port f
Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the past. I'm
trying to connect to a machine running VNC Free edition in an office. I can
make the connection (having set up port forwarding on the router) but it
hangs, with only the top third of the screen visible after several minute
12 matches
Mail list logo