Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: Treewide plane/crtc legacy state sweeping

2024-10-25 Thread Jani Nikula
uldn't be >> forgotten as easily. > > Ping, anyone have thoughts on this? I'd like to get something > like this in at some point to make the legacy state (ab)users > easily visible... On the approach, Acked-by: Jani Nikula with or without converting legacy into a point

Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/encoder_slave: make mode_valid accept const struct drm_display_mode

2024-11-18 Thread Jani Nikula
m_encoder_slave to nouveau > is really the best course for now. Granted, the dvo part of i915 is ugly, but it's also only relevant for the oldest hardware i915 supports. Like 20 years old. Not sure there's much return on investment in big refactoring, more risk that it breaks without nobody noticing. Just let it be in i915? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/connector: make mode_valid_ctx accept const struct drm_display_mode

2024-11-18 Thread Jani Nikula
hkov Acked-by: Jani Nikula > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 2 +- > include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h| 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm

Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/connector: make mode_valid accept const struct drm_display_mode

2024-11-18 Thread Jani Nikula
Acked-by: Jani Nikula -- Jani Nikula, Intel