On 01/07/2013 03:55 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 03:48 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> On 01/07/2013 03:28 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2013 03:15 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
Add a cpu notifier to virtio-net, so that we can reset the
virtqueue affinity if the cpu hotplug happens. It i
>>> On 04.01.13 at 18:25, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Right, so where is virtual mapping of control page established?
> I could not find relevant code in SLES kernel which does that.
In the hypervisor (xen/arch/x86/machine_kexec.c:machine_kexec_load()).
xen/arch/x86/machine_kexec.c:machine_kexec() then
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 19:11 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:41:17PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 04.01.13 at 15:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, And
On 07/01/13 10:25, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 19:11 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Because current KEXEC_CMD_kexec_load does not load kernel
image and other things into Xen memory. It means that it
should live som
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 10:46 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Given that /sbin/kexec creates a binary blob in memory, surely the most
> simple thing is to get it to suitably mlock() the region and give a list
> of VAs to the hypervisor.
More than likely. The DOMID_KEXEC thing was just a radon musin
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:11:46PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:41:17PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 04.01.13 at 15:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +00
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:48:20AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.01.13 at 18:25, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > Right, so where is virtual mapping of control page established?
> > I could not find relevant code in SLES kernel which does that.
>
> In the hypervisor (xen/arch/x86/machine_kexec.c:ma
>>> On 07.01.13 at 13:52, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:48:20AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.01.13 at 18:25, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> > Right, so where is virtual mapping of control page established?
>> > I could not find relevant code in SLES kernel which does that.
>>
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:34 +, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> I think that new kexec hypercall function should mimics kexec syscall.
We want to have an interface can be used by non-Linux domains (both dom0
and domU) as well though, so please bear this in mind.
Historically we've not always been good a
Il 07/01/2013 01:02, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> Il 02/01/2013 06:03, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
2)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:38:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/06/2013 09:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:18:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> Polling errors were ignored by vhost/vhost_net, this may lead to crash when
> >> trying to remove vhost from waitqueue
On 01/07/2013 10:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:38:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 01/06/2013 09:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:18:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Polling errors were ignored by vhost/vhost_net, this may lead to
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:18:46PM -0500, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
> xen_add_device() in drivers/xen/pci.c allocates a struct
> physdev_pci_device_add on the stack and then writes to optarr[0].
> The previous declaration of struct physdev_pci_device_add contained
> a zero-length optarr[] array, pr
>>> On 07.01.13 at 16:08, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:18:46PM -0500, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
>> xen_add_device() in drivers/xen/pci.c allocates a struct
>> physdev_pci_device_add on the stack and then writes to optarr[0].
>> The previous declaration of struct physde
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:11:46PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:41:17PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > >>> On 04.01.13 at 15:2
On 04/01/13 14:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 27/12/12 18:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Andrew Cooper writes:
>>>
On 27/12/2012 07:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The syscall ABI still has the wrong semantics.
>
> A
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 07/01/2013 01:02, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>> Il 02/01/2013 06:03, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>
> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 02:36:13PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> This drops the cmd completion list spin lock and makes the cmd
> completion queue lock-less.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asias He
Nicholas, any feedback?
> ---
> drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 46 +-
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
