On Tuesday 15 July 2008 12:24:54 Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:56:18AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > This is asking for trouble... a config option to disable this would be
> > nice. But as I don't know which problem this patch originally addre
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:52:09 Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:41:38PM -0500, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > + /* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4)
> > + || virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIR
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:09:59PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 12:24:54 Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> > Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:56:18AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > This is asking for trouble... a config option to disable this would be
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 12:24:54 Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>> Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:56:18AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> This is asking for trouble... a config option to disable this would be
>>> nice. But as I don't know which problem thi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:25:04PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Oops. I grepped for LRO when I did this and found nothing.
>
> How's this one?
Looks good. Thanks!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.or
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> fix for pv.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c |5
> >> arch/x86/ker
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> >>
>> >> fix for pv.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:52 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> because of not ccing you?
Because it's wrong.
> >
> > What are you doing here and why aren't you cc-ing the maintainers?
>
> did you checking tip tree for x86 changing?
No, this was brou
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:51 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >
> > Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > What are you doing here and why aren't you cc-ing the maintainers?
>
> Sorry. I was about to bring you into the lo
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 12:10 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:51 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:51 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> >
>> > Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > What are you doing here and why
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Suresh Siddha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>
>> Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> What are you doing here and why aren't you cc-ing the maintainers?
>
> Sorry. I was about to bring y
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 12:22 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Suresh Siddha
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >>
> >> Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> What are you doing here and why a
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hmm.. probably a stupid question: but what could happen that a real cpu
> (not virtual) becomes unresponsive so that it won't schedule a MAX_RT_PRIO-1
> prioritized task for 5 seconds?
The original problem (once I heard and easily reproduced) was there was an
another MAX_RT
[PATCH] virtio_net: Delay dropping tx skbs
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
> Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What are you doing here and why aren't you cc-ing the maintainers?
Sorry. I was about to bring you into the loop.
Yinghai posted 32bit native apic_ops(similar to my 64bit apic o
Thank you for useful feedbacks!
Here is the updated version.
Could you put this on top of your patches, Rusty?
Thanks,
H.Seto
If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up
by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because the
locked cpu cannot stop. This means all ot
Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Thank you for useful feedbacks!
> Here is the updated version.
> Could you put this on top of your patches, Rusty?
>
> Thanks,
> H.Seto
>
>
> If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up
> by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because th
Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> I'd set the default to zero. I beleive that's what Heiko suggested too.
Oh, yes, you are right. I missed to catch the suggestion.
I'll post fixed version soon. Wait a minutes...
Thanks,
H.Seto
___
Virtualization mailing list
V
19 matches
Mail list logo
