On (Tue) 15 Jul 2014 [12:45:56], Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:10:28AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Mon) 14 Jul 2014 [20:50:06], Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > v3:
> > > > - Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: d
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:10:28AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 14 Jul 2014 [20:50:06], Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > v3:
> > > - Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: devices which have
> > >->init() registered get their rand
On (Mon) 14 Jul 2014 [20:50:06], Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > v3:
> > - Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: devices which have
> >->init() registered get their randomness added to the system each
> >time they're switched in, but
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> v3:
> - Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: devices which have
>->init() registered get their randomness added to the system each
>time they're switched in, but devices that don't have the init
>callback don't contribu
v3:
- Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: devices which have
->init() registered get their randomness added to the system each
time they're switched in, but devices that don't have the init
callback don't contribute to system randomness more than once. The
weirdness is resolved
