On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:54 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 02:40:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
> > problematic since there no way for to schedule another process which
> > may serve for the control virtqueue
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 02:40:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
> problematic since there no way for to schedule another process which
> may serve for the control virtqueue. This might be the case when the
> control virtqueue is emulated by
Adding netdev.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 1:09 PM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:31 PM Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:40:27 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
> > > problematic since there no way for to sched
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:31 PM Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:40:27 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
> > problematic since there no way for to schedule another process which
> > may serve for the control virtqueue. This might b
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:40:27 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
> problematic since there no way for to schedule another process which
> may serve for the control virtqueue. This might be the case when the
> control virtqueue is emulated by softw
We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
problematic since there no way for to schedule another process which
may serve for the control virtqueue. This might be the case when the
control virtqueue is emulated by software. This patch switches to use
completion to allow the CPU to
