- for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
- int cpu = set ? i : -1;
- virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
- virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
- }
+ if (set) {
+ i = 0;
+ for_each_onli
On 01/25/2013 05:05 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 05:00 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 01/25/2013 04:36 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
>>> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
>>> Fix this bu
On 01/25/2013 05:00 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 04:36 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
>> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
>> Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per
On 01/25/2013 04:36 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
> Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
> to find the mapping from CPU to
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue.
Cc: Rusty Russell
C
