On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:25:04PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Oops. I grepped for LRO when I did this and found nothing.
>
> How's this one?
Looks good. Thanks!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.or
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:52:09 Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:41:38PM -0500, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > + /* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4)
> > + || virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIR
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:41:38PM -0500, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> + /* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4)
> + || virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6)
> + || virtio_has_fea
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Finally this patch lets virtio_net receive GSO packets in addition
to sending them. This can definitely be optimised for the non-GSO
case. For comparison the Xen approach stores one page in each skb
and uses subsequent skb's pages to construct an SG skb inste
