From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:45:42 -0700
> David Miller wrote:
> > I'm not so certain now that we know it's the jiffies wrap point :-)
> >
> > The fixes in question are attached below and they were posted and
> > discussed on netdev:
> >
>
> Yep, this
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Yep, this patch gets rid of my spinning thread. I can't find this patch
> or any discussion on marc.info; is there a better netdev list archive?
See the "linkwatch bustage in git-net" thread on netdev
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/
David Miller wrote:
> I'm not so certain now that we know it's the jiffies wrap point :-)
>
> The fixes in question are attached below and they were posted and
> discussed on netdev:
>
Yep, this patch gets rid of my spinning thread. I can't find this patch
or any discussion on marc.info; is th
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:22:17 -0700
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Five minutes after boot is when jiffies wraps. Are you sure it's
> > a list-screwup rather than a jiffy-wrap screwup?
> >
>
>
> Hm, its suggestive, isn't it? Apparently they've alr
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Five minutes after boot is when jiffies wraps. Are you sure it's
> a list-screwup rather than a jiffy-wrap screwup?
>
Hm, its suggestive, isn't it? Apparently they've already fixed this in
the sekret networking clubhouse, so I'll need to track it down.
J
_
On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:00:05 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
> >
> > These days the link watch mechanism is an integral part of the
> > network subsystem as it manages the carrier status. So it now
David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:00:05 -0700
>
>
>> Herbert Xu wrote:
>>
>>> [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
>>>
>>> These days the link watch mechanism is an integral part of the
>>> network subsystem as
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:00:05 -0700
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
> >
> > These days the link watch mechanism is an integral part of the
> > network subsystem as it manages the carrier status. So it n
Herbert Xu wrote:
> [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
>
> These days the link watch mechanism is an integral part of the
> network subsystem as it manages the carrier status. So it now
> makes sense to allocate some memory for it in net_device rather
> than allocating it on de
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:13:22 +1000
> [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
>
> These days the link watch mechanism is an integral part of the
> network subsystem as it manages the carrier status. So it now
> makes sense to allocate some mem
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:19:33PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Subject: xen: go back to using normal network stack carriers
>
> This effectively reverts xen-unstable change
> 14280:42b29f084c31. Herbert has changed the behaviour of the core
> networking to not delay an initial down->up
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Sorry, I had forgotten that I've already concluded previously that
> this doesn't work because we don't want to prevent the interface
> from being brought up (and other reasons). My memory is failing me :)
>
> So I think the best option now is to get rid of the delay on carrier
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:10:27PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> > We should just change this to use netif_device_attach and
> > netif_device_detach.
>
> Like this?
Sorry, I had forgotten that I've already concluded previously that
this doesn't work because we don't want to prevent the in
13 matches
Mail list logo
