Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices

patch series) and if you think there is anything tricky please send me a "git diff-tree --cc HEAD" after you have resolved the conflicts to your satisfaction and committed the test merge or just point me at the test merge in a tree somewhere (like this one). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgp83NY

Re: [PATCH] i2c: virtio: Fix the compiler warning when CONFIG_ACPI is not set

c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell > Signed-off-by: Jie Deng > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virti

Re: [PULL] virtio: virtio 1.0 support, misc patches

-* tags ... I am not doubting that these patches have been published and reviewed and tested, all I am saying is that they have not been in linux-next as those commits. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au pgpYdaol6xJV7.pgp Des

Re: [PULL] virtio: virtio 1.0 support, misc patches

atches. > David said he's fine with merging these patches through > my tree. > Rusty's on vacation, he acked using my tree for these, too. So, either none of this has been in linux-next or you have just rebased it all on top of v3.18 ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: [PATCH] virtio: include asm/barrier explicitly

Hi Rusty, On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:31:45 +0930 Rusty Russell wrote: > > PS. I'll squeeze these into this merge window, since they're trivial. s/'re trivial/fix bugs/ ;-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au pgpeVPexTgieB.pgp Descr

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (vhost_scsi)

[Adding Michael to cc] On Tue, 14 May 2013 12:16:20 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on x86_64: > > ERROR: "memcpy_fromiovec" [drivers/vhost/vhost_scsi.ko] undefined! > > > It needs to depend on NET since net/core/ provides that function. > > -- &

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)

Hi Greg, On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:02:29 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:55:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > The patch below is needed in the tty tree (which introduced CONFIG_TTY). > > Ok, now done. Thanks. > > Also, has someon

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)

Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/13/13 19:00, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Randy Dunlap writes: > >> > >>> On 02/13/13 00:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Changes since 20130212: > >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)

at the above select does nothing :-( But also, I can't see how VIRTIO_CONSOLE could be set in the first place since TTY is not set. (cc'ing some more people) (this is a randconfig that has TTY=n, HVC_DRIVER=n, but VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: Linux-next changes for module and virtio trees.

Hi Rusty, On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:58:15 +1030 Rusty Russell wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > > On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:56:56 +0930 Rusty Russell > > wrote: > >> > >> Please remove my quilt tree > >> http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ker

Re: Linux-next changes for module and virtio trees.

necessary since everything in these trees should have been merged by Linus during the merge window, so a merge of -rc1 or later should be a fast forward (though merging with the tag itself may produce a real merge). The second can be tricky to pick the right moment :-) -- Cheers, S

Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-net: remove useless disable on freeze

patches. > > This one did slip by, but it's harmless so no need to push AFAICT. > > Applied. This patch exists in two trees in linux-next already ... Davem's net tree (so presumably he will send it to Linus shortly) and Michael's vhost tree (is t

Re: Regression: patch " hvc_console: display printk messages on console." causing infinite loop with 3.2-rc0 + Xen.

Hi Greg, On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:30:12 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:13:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:48:06 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:30:08AM -0400, Konrad Rze

Re: Regression: patch " hvc_console: display printk messages on console." causing infinite loop with 3.2-rc0 + Xen.

it should all work anyway. Just a little more care, please. I would vote for reverting the original and having it resubmitted with corrections at some later date. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen)

Hi Konrad, On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 21:58:16 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Much appreciate for the report. I believe this fix (which I think hit > linux-next yesterday?) should do that: Yes, it is in next-20110805. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.or

Re: xen PV on HVM and initial domain merge in linux-next

wed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au Legal Stuff: By participating in linux-next, your subsystem tree contributions are public and will be included in the linux-next trees. You may be sent e-mail messages indicating errors or other iss

Re: xen PV on HVM and initial domain merge in linux-next

and makes sure that their tree does not reabse). Basically what you send to me should be what you intend to send to Linus during the next merge window. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgp2GiJC6HiEb.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: linux-next: Tree for June 18 (XEN build error)

nage.o] Error 1 > > > > What argument(s) do device_power_up() and device_resume() want now? In today's linux-next: void device_power_up(pm_message_t state) void device_resume(pm_message_t state) If someone can give me a patch, I can carry it in linux-next ... -- Chee

Re: [git pull] lguest: paravirt boot code

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:19:05 +1000 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, this time for sure! I haven't figured out how everyone does those neat > committer: commits* lists, but I'm sure there's an option here somewhere... try "git request-pull

Re: [PATCH 5/5 -v2] Move the lguest files that are i386 specific

0 drivers/lguest/{ => i386}/page_tables.c |0 drivers/lguest/{ => i386}/segments.c | 0 drivers/lguest/{ => i386}/switcher.S |0 11 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- Che

Re: [PATCH 4/5 -v2] Added generic lg.h in the include/linux directory

_LGUEST_H Maybe _LINUX_LG_H ? Also (this is for Rusty) include/linux/lguest.h is protected by _ASM_LGUEST_H ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgpIYsi2wqb7p.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [PATCH 4/7] Moved the io struct up to the generic lg.h

rivers/lguest/lg.h > +++ b/drivers/lguest/lg.h > @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ > +#ifndef _LGUEST_LG_GENERIC > +#define _LGUEST_LG_GENERIC Maybe _LGUEST_LG_H? and the arch ones could use _LGUEST_I386_LG_H etc. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/

Re: [PATCH 2/7] Added generic lg.h in lguest directory.

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:32:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Add a generic lg.h file to call the architecture specific one. Please combine this with the previous patch so that the tree will build at each step. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMA

Re: [PATCH 1/6] lguest: host code tidyups

On Tue, 15 May 2007 21:42:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:17:07 +1000 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > @@ -420,7 +421,7 @@ static int __init init(void) > > lock_cpu_hotplug(); > > if

Re: [PATCH 1/6] lguest: host code tidyups

on_each_cpu(adjust_pge, 0, 0, 1); > + on_each_cpu(adjust_pge, (void *)0, 0, 1); Sorry? What ever happened to a simple NULL? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgpADcZ

Re: [patch 3/9] lguest: the host code

sked before, but is there some reason this has no copyright and license statement? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgpcHdbmX9cMx.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Virtualization ma