Hi Niklas,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 03:51:55PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Previously I used virtio-iommu as a non-s390x test vehicle[0] for the
> single queue flushing scheme introduced by my s390x DMA API conversion
> series[1]. For this I modified virtio-iommu to a) use .iotlb_s
Add ops->flush_iotlb_all operation to enable virtio-iommu for the
dma-iommu deferred flush scheme. This results in a significant increase
in performance in exchange for a window in which devices can still
access previously IOMMU mapped memory when running with
CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_LAZY. The pre
Hi All,
Previously I used virtio-iommu as a non-s390x test vehicle[0] for the
single queue flushing scheme introduced by my s390x DMA API conversion
series[1]. For this I modified virtio-iommu to a) use .iotlb_sync_map
and b) enable IOMMU_CAP_DEFERRED_FLUSH. It turned out that deferred
flush and e
Pull out the sync operation from viommu_map_pages() by implementing
ops->iotlb_sync_map. This allows the common IOMMU code to map multiple
elements of an sg with a single sync (see iommu_map_sg()).
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230726111433.1105665-1-schne...@linux.ibm.com/
Signed-off-by: