On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:55 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:42:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams
> wrote:
> >
> > My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The
> > rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going
> > to review th
Hi Stefano,
> From: Stefano Garzarella
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 8:11 PM
>
> Maybe the only missing point is a way to specify the default bus driver to use
> for a device. Of course the workaround is to unbind it and bind to the desired
> one.
>
Unbind bind can be done but it is slower f
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:34:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 5:48 PM Parav Pandit wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 3:08 PM
> >> >$ vdpa/vdpa dev add mgmtdev vdpasim_net name vdpa0 mac
> >> >00:11:22:33:44:55 $ echo 0 > /sys/bus/vdp
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:31:22AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 5:47 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:24:47AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:16 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:21:15PM +, Parav Pa
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 05:30:28AM +0200, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2021/10/20 19:03, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 20-10-21, 12:55, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> >> If the timeout cannot be disabled, then the driver should be fixed to
> >> always copy buffers and hold on to them to avoid memory corruption i
On 10/28/21 3:27 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
The pvops function for Xen PV guests handling the interrupt flag are
much more complex than needed.
With the supported Xen hypervisor versions they can be simplified a
lot, especially by removing the need for disabling preemption.
Juergen Gross (2):
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:47:09PM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-10-21, 12:38, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > I don't quite understand how that would be safe since
> > virtqueue_add_sgs() can fail after a few iterations and all queued
> > request buffers can have FAIL_NEXT set. In such a case,
Hi "Christian,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[also build test ERROR on next-20211028]
[cannot apply to drm/drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next
drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next linus/master
airlied/drm-next v5.15-rc7]
