On 11/05/2012 09:08 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Jason Wang writes:
+struct virtnet_info {
+ u16 num_queue_pairs;/* # of RX/TX vq pairs */
+ u16 total_queue_pairs;
+
+ struct send_queue *sq;
+ struct receive_queue *rq;
+ struct virtqueue *cvq;
+
+ str
On 11/05/2012 07:46 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Jason Wang writes:
This patch implement the {set|get}_channels method of ethool to allow user to
change the number of queues dymaically when the device is running. This would
let the user to tune the device for specific applications.
...
+ /*
On 11/05/2012 07:16 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Jason Wang writes:
This addes multiqueue support to virtio_net driver. There's two mode supported:
single queue pair mode and multiple queue pairs mode. An obvious
difference compared with a physical mq card is that virtio-net reserve
first two virtq
On 11/16/2012 10:23 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> To be honest I'd nack this kind of patch. The test is only redundant in the
> most trivial sense that the compiler can easily optimise away. The point of
> the test is to make sure that the range is OK even if the type subsequently
> becomes s
Hello Brian,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this isn't a valid use case or generally sane thing to do, but we
> have a bug (link, with details, below) filed for a panic against a
> detach-disk/attach-disk sequence of an ext4 mounted vd device on a rhel
> ker
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:35:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 08:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 11:38:39AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > @@ -924,11 +1032,10 @@ static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct
> > > > net_device *dev,
> > > >
